ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
You still haven's said what you mean by "mechanical" but if you mean something like deterministic, then why not? How do you go from your premiss to your conclusion?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How Does the Existence of God Negate Darwinian Evolution?
- Thread starter SalixIncendium
- Start date
You still haven's said what you mean by "mechanical" but if you mean something like deterministic, then why not? How do you go from your premiss to your conclusion?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No. No. I am sorry, but just no. You have heard some terms and misunderstood them. That does not help your claims it only makes them sound sciency.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Theories are based on facts. And even more important, theories explain facts. The late bombardment theory explains the fact that the strikes from outer space were finished more than 3.8 billion years ago. There was no way for the Earth to grow significantly since then.
Colt
Well-Known Member
I don't expect you to understand or agree. You have an Atheist agenda.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I have a science based agenda. Religious views have nothing to do with it. Do you see me making that error in your case?
Colt
Well-Known Member
Atheistic Science agenda. Don't kid yourself.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Colt
Well-Known Member
We don't, that's faith.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
There is no "Atheistic Science agenda". There is only science.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Wrong answer. For you it is faith because you don't understand the science and will not bother to educate yourself.
An honest person would have admitted not knowing instead of making false personal attacks against others.
Colt
Well-Known Member
You are self deceived if you think that you don't have an anti-God agenda. You are on a religion site not a science site.
Stromatolites can be due to natural material deposition or some other abiogenic mechanism.
McBell
Unbound
What is this "Atheistic agenda" you keep accusing others of and how does it differ from "Atheistic Science agenda"?
You brought it up and actively accused another member of it.
So now you really need to explain exactly what it is.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
This is a false statement.
Colt
Well-Known Member
An atheist agenda is when one is motivated to undermine the faith in God held by people of faith. It doesn't seek to reform and improve faith, its actively engaged in discrediting faith.
Lucifer fell into dangerous self contemplation and eventual rejection of the unseen Universal Father. The Legacy of the Lucifer rebellion is perpetuated, albeit unknowingly, by Atheists who actively seek to discredit religious faith on the grounds of credulity. These are the same people who claim that primitive life forms kept falling uphill until will conscious man popped out.
McBell
Unbound
So when you undermine the faith of other theists are you revealing your "atheist agenda" or is it only atheists who are accused of "atheist agenda"?
Is your faith really so weak that truth and fact threaten so?
seems to me that would be a YOU problem.
So why blame atheists for your lacking faith?
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
What exactly is the faith in God? There are countless different religions, cults, sects, and denominations that believe in all sorts of different god(s).
Your evidence for this is......... missing.
ppp
Well-Known Member
That is certainly an idea. How do you plan on demonstrating that it is true?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
The vast majority of scientists are not "atheists", but there is a large number of them that are "agnostic", which is not the same as "atheist".
But the evolution of our universe, planet, and life is not "atheistic", so there's a serious misconception with assuming that we are.
But the evolution of our universe, planet, and life is not "atheistic", so there's a serious misconception with assuming that we are.
Colt
Well-Known Member
There is no proof that the life which evolved from the simple, up to minds that could contemplate such, was created by mind. I have no proof.
Colt
Well-Known Member
Is Richard Dawkins a Scientist and an Atheist?