• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How Does the Existence of God Negate Darwinian Evolution?

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
If God used the process of evolution to create life beginning 550 million years ago then the arrival of Adam and Eve from another would after humans evolved would work just fine.
Life is far older than that on the Earth. Why could you think that life began with the Cambrian?
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Why not? There is quite a bit of evidence for it. Just because you do not know you should never assume that others do not.
I never assumed that others don't believe in life ancient life on earth, I'm just not convinced that 3 billion years prior to the Cambrian there was "life".
 
Last edited:

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Gas heavens burning as natural light is life support.

Stone is just mass.

God as stone can de evolve to its lowest hell stone form volcanic mass.

Be vacuum sucked cooled with water cooling. Yet deeper stone mass once above ground owns evidence held human machine parts. Bio life.

Common sense how God as stone mass returned to its hell body. That form hell gas heaven origins why science is wrong.

Hell for God in space energy mass burning was not volcanic hell.

Stone cooling formed God stone hell.

Half origin living earth life is now underground history. Where the life ended.

De evolution was a Michael teaching.

Science not thinking correctly places water owning microbes as beginning. The flood of earth teaching quotes the water of life stopped God from destroying us. Sealed off attack on heart.

Core eruption.

Life did not begin there. It ended.

Inferring not to natural history by human observation. Included archaeology in geology. Part of scientific teaching is not just relative to a design for invention.

It is wholistic advice. Use of all past information in seen observations.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Yeah, but why? Why do you think that life began 540 million years ago? Just an arbitrary number that you picked out of a hat?
Because we have a very good record of diverse life forms from the Cambrian period. I believe that at 1 billion years the planet was a small fraction of its size.
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
Because we have a very good record of diverse life forms from the Cambrian period.
That would be answer to, Why do you think there was diverse life 540 mya. How ever the question was, Why do you think that life began 540 million years ago?
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
That would be answer to, Why do you think there was diverse life 540 mya. How ever the question was, Why do you think that life began 540 million years ago?
Because celestial beings initiated life on earth which evolved into life as we know it today.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Because we have a very good record of diverse life forms from the Cambrian period. I believe that at 1 billion years the planet was a small fraction of its size.
Why would you believe that? The late bombardment era was over by 3.8 billion years ago. At that time the Earth was roughly the size that it is today.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Scientific theories are backed up by evidence, unlike religiously motivated assertions.
The existence of scientists who can postulate theories is proof that the universe of the scientist isn't entirely mechanical.

Atheistic Scientist didn't create the life that evolved, they just deny that it could have a creator.
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
The existence of scientists who can postulate theories is proof that the universe of the scientist isn't entirely mechanical.

Depends what you mean by "mechanical". What exactly do you think it proves, and where is the actual proof?

Atheistic Scientist didn't create the life that evolved, they just deny that it could have a creator.

Generally speaking they don't deny that it could have a creator, just that there is no evidence (or other reason to think) that it did.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Depends what you mean by "mechanical". What exactly do you think it proves, and where is the actual proof?



Generally speaking they don't deny that it could have a creator, just that there is no evidence (or other reason to think) that it did.
If the universe was entirely mechanical no two so called scientist would have differing opinions about the universe.
 
Top