They're trying to get into heaven. Also, many earn a living from religion.What is the ‘obvious vested interest’ of Bible believers
That's obviously not a dealbreaker for you. You're a Christian. Fraud and hypocrisy are rife in the church.Aside of that there’s also been a lot of dishonesty exposed with supposed fossil finds trying to prove ToE.
Everybody knows that Christianity is atrophying away in the West. You don't need a Bible for that. And knowledgeable people know to disregard unfalsifiable religious pronouncements about end times, which are famously wrong.Knowledgeable Bible believers know that unbelievers and scoffers will increase in the end times
You don't. I do.No one knows how evolution works.
Did you mean compared to creationism?They say mutations are random and something about the environment ‘drives’ changes by way of survival and reproduction. Not a very exact science.
Let me Google that for you:How is the level of homosexuality particularly in the humans tie in with ‘fitness’.
How Does Homosexuality Confer A Survival Advantage?
For those who think it's easier to annoy you than to Google 'How does homosexuality confer a survival advantage?' themselves.
letmegooglethat.com
If any gods exist aware of our existence and capable of contacting us, they have shunned man.You have shunned God at best.
She's educated. You're brainwashed. They're very different. She learned evolution by being shown the evidence Darwin had and how he came to his conclusions using it, and what subsequent evidence confirms them. This is how one learns critical thinking as well as the facts of the theory of evolution. This is different from indoctrination, which is just repetition without evidence, and unlike with the evolution professor who doesn't care if you believe it, the creationism "teacher" is very much interested in whether you believe or not, and will chastise those who don't.You have no idea the real reason why you have been brainwashed with the concept of humans coming from apes.
You won't convince a critical thinker of anything with insufficiently evidenced claims. If his brain has been washed, it's been washed of gullibility and the willingness to believe by faith.You won’t be convinced by another human of believing in anything else with that level of brainwashing.
The theory is correct beyond reasonable doubt. It's considered settled science by the scientific community.So Theory of evolution has jumped to factual status now.
Not credible. This is you paying homage to critical thinking and empiricism, things you have never had enough interest in to discover what they are and what they can do, and not how you decide what is true about the world. It's analogous to hypocrisy, where one lacking moral fiber gives homage to moral behavior even as he does the opposite.I’d have to see evidence
I read "atheist liars" from you recently. But don't worry. I doubt anybody was offended by your opinion.haven’t called anyone nasty names
How do you think they fabricated her? 3D printer?Lucy is what I call fabricated evidence.
The number is unimportant - 9% or 90%. If even 3% of the DNA is "junk" DNA, the implications are devastating for biblical creationism and intelligent design. In evolutionary theory, it's predicted. There is no mechanism for culling such genes if they don't manifest phenotypically and confer some competitive disadvantage. But why is nonfunctional there in the DNA you believe your god put there?“About 90 percent of DNA is thought to be non-functional, and mutations there generally have no effect."
I didn't see anybody else comment on this, but 999/1000 is not 0.001%.0.001%, as guessed by the the source above is very relevant showing your beliefs to be absolutely absurd.
What's your larger point? That that means that it didn't or couldn't have happened? If so, that would be incorrect. Pluto has never been observed to complete an orbit around the sun. Do you think that means it cannot or has not occurred?macroevolution has never been observed
And once again, why would that matter to a creationist? Nothing he believes happened has ever been observed. Neither you nor he ever observed a universe created, a planet created, or kinds created. Your special pleading (unjustified double standard) is ineffective.
The theory is correct, and nobody need show people evidence to people who don't use it to decide what is true about the world nor know how to evaluate it or any attendant argument. Nor should they expect the creationist to look at the evidence if they do. I don't need to ask whether you looked at any of the links I Googled for you. Why would you? You don't care what they say.You haven’t shown anything factual that shows the ToE to be correct
Nor need he. Do you think otherwise? The theory is correct beyond reasonable doubt, and divine creationism, which is an unfalsifiable claim, is also unevidenced, so what's to disprove? Such claims can be disregarded without rebuttal (Hitchen's Razor, Sagan' Razor).You haven’t proved your tree of life or disproved creation in the slightest.