You thought wrong because you don't understand the theory. It just doesn't matter because harmful mutations die out quickly and beneficial ones spread through the population - as I have explained in detail to you at least three times now and you've totally ignored. Wilful ignorance and a refusal to learn doesn't do your case any favours at all (but is sadly typical of creationists).
How do you explain how and why bad mutations die out quickly? Correlating or cataloging it, after the fact, with casino math is fuzzy science? How does that explanation differ from cataloging the winners of the lottery, while never telling us the future of the lottery. It falls way short of reason. It only appeals to fuzzy dice emotions like playing the lottery.
The same faux casino science, that supports your claim, also assumes any number of solvents can allow the conditions for life to appear on other planets. This is also based on casino science math odds and not any real hard evidence. It is a type of mathematical religion using a math oracle. The fuzzy dice premise of finite odds for anything, allows the false claim of alternate solvents for life, even without the requirement of any hard proof or logic. You assume your math is infallible. But math is also used in computer games to allow infinite lives and all type of virtual; faux, reality. Math, like a good horse, will do whatever you need it to do. Statistics was designed to be a tool to help build, but has morphed into a faux oracle for fortune telling.
For example, ammonia, which is a suggested alternate solvent; :NH3, can also form strong secondary hydrogen bonds and is therefore an assumed solvent for life on other planets. However, it has three hydrogen; H, and one pair of nonbonding electrons:
) for secondary bonding self adhesion. This ratio of 3H and 1
), cannot form as many hydrogen bonds as water, which has two hydrogen bonding hydrogen and two nonbonding electron pairs; H2O
. Each water molecule can form up to four secondary bonds with other water molecules, while ammonia can only average one hydrogen bond with other ammonia molecules, since each ammonia molecule only has one extras electron pair
) to share with three hydrogen. This difference in solvent self binding strength is evident in ammonia having a boiling point; BP of -21F while water has a BP of +212F. Both have the same molecular weight. The water matrix is much stronger.
The stronger self adhesion of water; compared to all the rest, makes a big difference in terms of life. Water's strength for secondary bonding self adhesion can force the organics to obey, since the self adhesion of its four hydrogen bonds, can out do the secondary bonding of the organics of life. This is why harmful mutations do not last. Harmful to life is not energetically favorable to water's self adhesion. Bad base pairing adds energy that water will need to deal with or allow.
Alternate solvents, like ammonia, and all the others suggested solvents for life; oracle based, would have the opposite affect. Since their self binding is no where as strong as water, this allows the organics too many opportunities to lead, to their own dissociated doom. Casino math is actually much more appropriate to life in ammonia and other suggested solvents than it is to life in water. Life in water is not about dice and cards, which are man made objects. It is about natural potentials and natural chemical selection at the nanoscale, loading the dice, using the powerful secondary bonding matrix of water. NASA looks for water on other planets as sign of possible life, not other solvents. It is not about the dream of winning the lottery but practical need.
The current life sciences do not even understand the importance of secondary bonding priority even in the brain. The current life sciences are addicted to dice and card math, that conveniently interfaces to the same math used by politics. Political promises needs fuzzy dice to work; fool people. Explain life without fuzzy dice. Once a politician has to tell the truth they melt. They need the emotional confidence game fuzzy dice can provide; lottery is winnable.
I am not saying religion; Creationism, has a more detailed logical explanation for life and evolution. However, I am saying fuzzy dice science is not the final frontier. It was useful, but it is now an obsolete stepping stone.
Humans and chimps are both great apes. Combination of ignorance and English comprehension fail.
