Its mostly white people that I see doing it.
I have been fortunate enough to talk to Black Hebrew Israelites and a few Rastafari who have said that Jesus is black, so it's equal to those who have said Jesus is white - I've been unfortunate to have someone say because they are black they are superior to us "whites". That is an awful thing.
They even tried to bury it in Americas educational system. I am not making a case, I have shown the case that the bible itself makes. The bible seriously leans towards Jesus being a man of color, and highly unlikely a white man.
Its not poetic imagery that Jesus was from the liniage of David, thats bible, David was Blcak, thats bible.
Sorry to hear Americans are trying to do that, but you shouldn't be responding to people trying to prove Jesus was white by claiming/trying to prove Jesus was black. Where is it in the Bible that David is black, by the way? That sounds like an interesting read.
However, Song of Solomon 5:10: "My lover is radiant and ruddy, outstanding among ten thousand. " - Again, radiant. This is Solomon, a child of David. Therefore, people can still claim Jesus would have been white. If you aren't making a case out of it, I'd surely hate to see if you were. Again, this is poetry.
Jesus was middle eastern, thats bible and geography, not poetic imagery. His appearence now is Dark Bronze, thats bible, not image.
Forgetting, of course the poetic verse (btw, you know what colour bronze is, right? There are many different variations of it, from very light orange-y to very dark, almost black
) ...
... and the fact it says "GLOWING"... that Israel was a multi-cultural melting pot at the time, with Romans, Greeks, Egyptians, Ethiopians, and possibly even as far away as Indian Buddhists being there, then sure. But, you can pull up a photograph of a black Jewish person, you can pull up a photo of a white Jewish person, you can pull up a photo of an Arab Jewish person. (By the way, I hate the term "person of color". It's a disgusting term. White is still a colour)
What does this prove, though?
By the way, don't misunderstand, I'm not claiming Jesus was "white", but I don't think he was "black" either. I think he would have been of an Arab or the stereotypical "Mediterranean" skin, because of geography, but either way, it doesn't matter, and I don't know what agenda you're trying to pursue here, but it certainly doesn't seem like a wise direction to head in. Let Jesus' words be the guide, not his race. I love Jesus for what he taught, not because he was of the same race as myself.
The Bible may actually leave out Jesus' race for this precise reason: to avoid claim to superiority. Sounds good to me.
Peace.