yourgraceisenough
Active Member
We know he can lie about Scripture, but surely he wouldn't falsely accuse anyone.
no unlike you....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We know he can lie about Scripture, but surely he wouldn't falsely accuse anyone.
you have decided that you can be saved and not repent, have your cake and eat it so to speak...
no unlike you....
So you slander Christ, you slander me.
Care to lie about anything else?
yeah wooo hoo I won the bet £50 said I could get this thread over 2000 posts...
Praise the Lord...
ha ha ha truth hurts, repent its good for the soul...
Trolling is nothing to be proud of.
Half of the posts on this thread is from yourself - one liners.
who was trolling apart from you and your walking sock draw....
No. I'm not hurt.
I am impressed with your dishonesty. I would not expect someone who fancies himself to be a god to arrive there by willful fantasy.
I'm not a god. you've been listening to the LDS to long...
you get the lines you have already had...
I think I'm getting a picture from all this anyway. There are certain aspects (or applications) of this topic you aren't willing to discuss, and if someone else brings them up, you're going to go into canned-response mode.
Since you're still leaving it up to me to try and guess what all this means, the only thing that makes sense to me is that you're demonstrating rather than explaining how you resolve the contradictions I pointed out, mainly; by denial.
Do you consider denial a form of penance?
Now you're just blindly throwing crap out.
Keep throwing the poo maybe you'll hit something.
By the way, what the sam hell makes you think that LDS are affirming to homosexuals?
I think I'm getting a picture from all this anyway. There are certain aspects (or applications) of this topic you aren't willing to discuss, and if someone else brings them up, you're going to go into canned-response mode.
Since you're still leaving it up to me to try and guess what all this means, the only thing that makes sense to me is that you're demonstrating rather than explaining how you resolve the contradictions I pointed out, mainly; by denial, ie., pretending they're not there.
Do you consider denial a form of penance?
You're confusing ignoring with answering.
Oh, yes, the site with no research.
Denial here is merely a tool for self-justifying dishonesty.
Denial here is merely a tool for self-justifying dishonesty.
yyyyaaaawwwwnnnn keep your words my stance is the same...