• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How should the Christian Church treat homosexuals?

Status
Not open for further replies.

yourgraceisenough

Active Member
Indeed he did and after reading it in context I believe it is referring to Jews and Gentiles

The next day Peter started out with them, and some of the believers from Joppa went along. 24 The following day he arrived in Caesarea. Cornelius was expecting them and had called together his relatives and close friends. 25 As Peter entered the house, Cornelius met him and fell at his feet in reverence. 26 But Peter made him get up. “Stand up,” he said, “I am only a man myself.”
27 While talking with him, Peter went inside and found a large gathering of people. 28 He said to them: “You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean. 29 So when I was sent for, I came without raising any objection. May I ask why you sent for me?”

The vision was a pre-message to Peter to not be afraid to enter the house of the gentiles.

If you read a few scriptures before it mentions animals to...:)
 

Fester

Active Member
To be married is to become one flesh.When a couple are joined as one flesh then new flesh can be produced.Something no other marriage will ever be equal to in the natural or spiritual realm.
Based on what you've said here, a husband and wife who remain childless cannot, by definition, rightlfully be married.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
nothing but would they get that protection if they did in fact just chose to be that way...
why do they need protection in the first place,
because of people like you maybe?

but if they cannot help themselves, should they be judged...
actually this is a problem for modern western societies to deal with and everyone (who lives in the modern western society) seems to agree that subjecting a child to an adult in a sexual manner is wrong...and have been able to figure that out with out the help of any type of divine intervention...go figure.
but it hasn't always been thought of that way, now has it?
and here, you have put yourself in a dilemma.
why would god allow for someone to be born a deviant?
where's the free will...


just an example really...:)[
no, your are comparing the 2. and obviously one has absolutely nothing to do with the other...futile, useless and groundless...
 

yourgraceisenough

Active Member
why do they need protection in the first place,
because of people like you maybe?


actually this is a problem for modern western societies to deal with and everyone (who lives in the modern western society) seems to agree that subjecting a child to an adult in a sexual manner is wrong...and have been able to figure that out with out the help of any type of divine intervention...go figure.
but it hasn't always been thought of that way, now has it?
and here, you have put yourself in a dilemma.
why would god allow for someone to be born a deviant?
where's the free will...



no, your are comparing the 2. and obviously one has absolutely nothing to do with the other...futile, useless and groundless...

if pedophiles cannot be proven to be born that way or any other sexual deviant from the norm why is it ok to assume a gay could be born that way...:)
 

Walkntune

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by Walkntune
To be married is to become one flesh.When a couple are joined as one flesh then new flesh can be produced.Something no other marriage will ever be equal to in the natural or spiritual realm.


Based on what you've said here, a husband and wife who remain childless cannot, by definition, rightlfully be married.
Notice can be produced in red.Not the same as will be.If a couple does have children then the combining of the two becoming one flesh is just evidenced in the children.
 
Last edited:

waitasec

Veteran Member
if pedophiles cannot be proven to be born that way or any other sexual deviant from the norm why is it ok to assume a gay could be born that way...:)

they are born that way and society deems that behavior as deviant because they are subjecting a child...this has nothing to do with mutual consent.
do you understand the difference?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top