-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How should the Christian Church treat homosexuals?
- Thread starter fantome profane
- Start date
- Status
Fester
Active Member
What's the difference? How is a straight couple who can't reproduce any different from a gay couple who can't reproduce, based on your definition of "one flesh"?
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
no, what is the problem?
waiting..
yourgraceisenough
Active Member
we are not condemned by what we eat and drink but by what comes out of our mouths...
And you believe that why?
Fester
Active Member
So you do agree that a husband and wife who cannot have children can't rightfully be married. Good to know. (see, I can play your game too)so gays and lesbians cannot be rightfully married got it, thank you....
yourgraceisenough
Active Member
waitasec
Veteran Member
only in festers mind...lol
so then homosexuals can rightfully get married in your mind...
got it
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
whats the problem?
Fester
Active Member
It has something to do with waitasec actually comprehending what I was saying, I think...fester just made that assumption so why is it in my mind....
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
sorry i didn't catch the problem with that
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
crickets....
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
helllooooo
anyone there?
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
???????????????????????????
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
:beach:
yourgraceisenough
Active Member
the difference is your rubbish at it...
no of course they are not, the fact they are put together, one man and one woman as God intended sets them up to be married, the fact they cannot bare children in a certain percentages of marriages does not stop them from being married...
and before you say it thats does not make gay marriages acceptable as the main purpose of marriage is reproduction...
waitasec
Veteran Member
so your definition of something that is wrong is if it harms someone....
can you see a problem with that....
yes that's right...
nothing.
Fester
Active Member
Does RF have an "obtuse poster of the year" award or something. Because you are campaigning hard for it.it's scripture and its God's nature....
yourgraceisenough
Active Member
theft does no physical harm is that wrong....
vandalising a phone box does no physical harm is that wrong
sex in the middle of the highstreet does no physical harm is that wrong...
- Status