Bear Wild
Well-Known Member
You mean the one you just made with a lack of understanding of biology and animal behavior.Again a silly unscientific reply.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You mean the one you just made with a lack of understanding of biology and animal behavior.Again a silly unscientific reply.
You mean the one you just made with a lack of understanding of biology and animal behavior.
Calling something silly just to dismiss it will never help you to understand what you clearly don't. So you can call this one silly too if you want but you will remain ignorant of biology and animal behavior.Still a silly reply, what next?
Calling something silly just to dismiss it will never help you to understand what you clearly don't. So you can call this one silly too if you want but you will remain ignorant of biology and animal behavior.
I will be happy to put together examples for you. Interesting that you have no scientific reply for your argument, but I will give you examples if you want.You didn't offer any scientific reply, so all your replies were silly and it's really meaningless.
I will be happy to put together examples for you. Interesting that you have no scientific reply for your argument, but I will give you examples if you want.
so you would call yourself an accident?To me, it seems very kind of insulting or
dismissive of the struggle of countless
generations of our ancestors to say we /
they had no role in raising ourselves out
of the med, that only via a "plan" or
a "god" could we do itl
If it is a god, seems like the turd could have
maybe not made us do all that work, and
then claim credit anyway.
As for your non-evidence,evidence:
Looking in MY mirror will give a different
impression than looking in yours.
some topics have no evidenceSince you have no evidence, I see little reason to consider your quips.
Till this page no one had offered a scientific explanation as of why humans are the only creature on earth that lives and thinks differently than all other creatures on earth.
some said the blue whales are so huge and hence they're different than all other animals,
some others said all animals are unique and they have some intelligence.
You're the losers, and those who listen to you are the losers, good luck.
that happens a lot around hereI told you brain capacity days ago. You ignored it as that was not the answer you wanted.
the chemistry and scheme of things was set into motion.....by GodHumans are the only creature on earth that lives and thinks differently than all other creatures on earth because GodDidIt.
Lightning is bright and thunder is loud because GodDidIt.
Volcanoes erupt because GodDidIt.
Good and Evil exist because GodDidIt.
There, now do you feel like a winner?
I told you brain capacity days ago. You ignored it as that was not the answer you wanted.
No similarity to human in the way of thinking and the way of living,
Animals are all the same, no thoughts, no plans.
Nothing solved with this post.So it's all about the brain's capacity, puzzle solved.
What, the blue whale is unique, all animals are unique,
no one offered a scientific reply other than silly comments.
What scientific reply would you be even willing to accept. The genetic similarity between chimpanzees and man which is 96%? The documented problems solving of animals filling animal behavior text books? The complex communications skills well documented in birds? The comparative anatomic studies between mammal brains of different species? The comparative physiology between vertebrates? The comparative embryology between vertebrates? There is so much scientific evidence that it is hard to know where to start or what you would even believe since you do not want to believe the obvious examples you have already been given by so many people. Which scientific journals will you accept? Which ones would you reject? You might start to think you have no intention of listening to anyone but your self especially when you start using words like "silly" Using words like this to try and degrade other peoples comments is a sign you will not accept anyone's comments but your own.What, the blue whale is unique, all animals are unique,
no one offered a scientific reply other than silly comments.
I don't think people are naturally wired to extend moral consideration to those outside their own tribe. Expanded compassion is usually a learned thing.My apologies. My wording was poor in reference to the chickens. It is just that when people see contained animals and view them only as a source of food for themselves they do not respect the animal and feel they can treat it inhumanly.
What scientific reply would you be even willing to accept. The genetic similarity between chimpanzees and man which is 96%? The documented problems solving of animals filling animal behavior text books? The complex communications skills well documented in birds? The comparative anatomic studies between mammal brains of different species? The comparative physiology between vertebrates? The comparative embryology between vertebrates? There is so much scientific evidence that it is hard to know where to start or what you would even believe since you do not want to believe the obvious examples you have already been given by so many people. Which scientific journals will you accept? Which ones would you reject? You might start to think you have no intention of listening to anyone but your self especially when you start using words like "silly" Using words like this to try and degrade other peoples comments is a sign you will not accept anyone's comments but your own.
I don't think people are naturally wired to extend moral consideration to those outside their own tribe. Expanded compassion is usually a learned thing.