What about dragons? Or are they a different taxonomical classification?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Human Animals?
- Thread starter The Hammer
- Start date
Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
Human excrement smells little better than that of the average Gibbon, probably worse.
Correct. This person just seems hung up on the non existent classification of Ape.
Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
That's true. Dragons are actually closely related to Pterosaurians and Crocodilians. Technically we're Archosaurs.What about dragons? Or are they a different taxonomical classification?
No lie.
Secret Chief
Very strong language
Too much information.
Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
I don't actually know what gibbon poo smells of. This lack of data will irk me.
Secret Chief
Very strong language
Personally I think I can get by without knowing.
Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
The internet is remarkably quiet on the subject. Now of course anyone monitoring my web searches, is going to wonder if I've finally cracked.
Well, I guess a trip to the zoo is going to be in order...
Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
I am already planning an expedition to shed light upon this too long neglected area of understanding.
I can see the Nobel prize now...and my acceptance speech.
FYI (you might find a different classification schema and nomenclature elsewhere, especially if more than a few years old):
The Hominoidea are the ape superfamily, or hominoids. Remove the lesser apes (gibbons and siamangs) and what remains is the family of great apes, the Hominidae, or hominids. Remove the pongids (subfamily Ponginae, or orangutans) and what remains is the subfamily Homininae (hominines) - the gorillas, chimps, bonobos and man. Remove tribe Gorillini and what remains is tribe Hominini (hominans?), then separate these into the subtribe Panina (chimps and bonomos) and the subtribe Hominina (or hominins = austrlopithecoids and genus Homo).
Here it is graphically:
Superfamily HOMINOIDEA ("hominoids") the apes -> lesser apes (Family HYLOBATIDAE) Gibbons and siamangs
↓
Family HOMINIDAE ("hominids") great apes -> (Subfamily PONGINAE) Orangutans
↓
Subfamily HOMININAE ("hominines") Gorilla, Pan and Homo -> Tribe GORILLINI
↓
Tribe HOMININI ("hominans?") Pan (chimps, bonobos) and Homo -> Subtribe PANINA
↓
Subtribe HOMININA ("hominins") Homo and Australopithecoids -> Austrlopithecoids (Australopithecus, Ardipithicus, Paranthropus)
↓
Genus Homo
Go back to post #42, I did ask that question.
Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
The subfamily Ponginae very possibly also including the now extinct* Gigantopithecus.
*Evolved into Yeti *cough*
You're just searching the wrong internet. Layperson search engines are garbage for doing any real research. There's an entire field dedicated to the study of crap - scatology. Go to a university library website, then start searching the databases of peer reviewed research (bonus points for getting help from the collections specialists who can assist you in optimizing your search terms and using the correct databases). You will find things. So.... so many things.
Wait... why are we talking about this?
Sounds like a crappy prize.
No. You asked if I would consider you evil. You understand the difference between doing something wrong or not okay to being evil, yes?
Secret Chief
Very strong language
God you talk some ****.
Little Dragon
Well-Known Member
I tried searching that term first and some very unsavory suggestions arrived in the results page, I have since disinfected my eyeballs with ACME sulfuric acid.
Thanks Germany