Baydwin
Well-Known Member
That's so true. I mean, if one form of animal or plant evolved over time into completely different forms then we'd see the intermediates, and there simply aren't any!What we see and the evidence shows is creatures evolve or adapt within specific boundaries. There is no such thing as a dogcat or an apehuman.
Like, if fish evolved into reptiles then we'd expect to see some kind of weird creature that can live in both water and on land, there are none!
And if reptiles evolved into mammals then there would be mammals that still lay eggs. But are there any such creatures? Not even in Australia!
And if humans evolved from monkeys we would see all sorts of large, tail-less primates with DNA very similar to our own. And yet none of you Charlesdarwinists can name a single kind!
Just face up to the truth will you, we're descended from a person made of animated clay, the facts are all around us. I mean, just dig in the ground and what do you find all your precious fossils buried in? Clay. As if any more proof were needed.