RichardParker
Member
Everything that is "we" is interaction. Our consciousness is interaction. Reincarnation is just a personal belief of mine. I believe that some interactive part that we could relate to as our "self" continues on after that stage we call death and on into another highly interactive existence.. Obviously there is nothing anyone can provide as evidence for this, which is why it is just a belief. I simply believe that after "death" we will be more interactive and more animated that most people think.
---
I don't object to you sharing something that is "just a belief" of yours.
I'm just still confused because you use terms in a way that seems entirely different to how the rest of us uses them.
If "consciousnes" is just "interaction", then sure... this will outlast us.
And as I've said, if you just believe that our parts (I assume you mean our atoms) will keep interacting after our death, I even agree with you.
So, if you describe THIS concept as "reincarnation" (our atoms keep interacting) and this interaction "consciousnes", then I'm on the same page as you are... I just use different terms to describe it, and I think the terms I use ("Interactions of atoms" f.e.) are less confusing, and don't hold bagage like the terms "reincarnation" do, which at least implies that we (and again: not what you seem to define the word "we" means, but our personality, our self-awareness, and these things) will eventually experience a different life in a different physical form. And I think that's what most people understand what you mean when you use the term "reincarnation", which is why I think you should reevaluate simply the terminology you use.