McBell
Unbound
appeal to emotion tactics only work on the choir.So you now support legalized murder of unborn children. Wonderful.
In case you failed to notice, not many choir members in this thread.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
appeal to emotion tactics only work on the choir.So you now support legalized murder of unborn children. Wonderful.
um...
How else is she supposed to speak of her beliefs?
Don't get me wrong.
I disagree with most of her beliefs.
However, how is she supposed to speak of her beliefs if not in a manner that reveals she believes them true?
But the mainstream does determine what political compromises are made.
Abortion isn't objectively right or wrong. There are just diverse opinions
which determine the eventual unhappy compromise made into law.
It was always human... in the same way that your hair or arm are human.
When it's born.
I believe everything is ultimately subjectively right or wrong.
Not that choir.appeal to emotion tactics only work on the choir.
In case you failed to notice, not many choir members in this thread.
Subjectively means it's a matter of opinion, there's no absolute right or wrong. Did you mean 'objectively'?
appeal to emotion tactics only work on the choir.
In case you failed to notice, not many choir members in this thread.
Yes, sorry, I mean objectively. It's also subjective, though, in the sense that I believe it is up to Holy Almighty God as to what is right and what is wrong.
There are a few words that I find unhelpful in this conversation. One is "murder". It's just too subjective. People get too attached, emotionally, to a very specific meaning for self serving reasons. The same person who justifies abortion because it's legal will still oppose executing Raif Badawi because they don't think Saudi Arabia should have such laws. Similarly, people who oppose abortion will support pre-emptive war, because they think that form of killing is Biblical.Well, admitting to condoning murder requires no choir and evidently does not appeal to your emotion. How does it feel to admittedly condone murder?
There are a few words that I find unhelpful in this conversation. One is "murder". It's just too subjective. People get too attached, emotionally, to a very specific meaning for self serving reasons. The same person who justifies abortion because it's legal will still oppose executing Raif Badawi because they don't think Saudi Arabia should have such laws. Similarly, people who oppose abortion will support pre-emptive war, because they think that form of killing is Biblical.
Tom
Well, I believe that voluntarily killing a human being is murder. I also believe that human life begins at conception. So from my perspective voluntary abortion is murder.
So a miscarriage is an accidental death? If a miscarriage occurs due to the mother not being healthy, when she could have had had a healthier lifestyle, is this manslaughter?
since I am not absolutely against abortion, what about her?Not that choir.
But there are plenty of emotional appeals when this subject comes up.
"But, but, what if she's only nine? And gang raped in prison? For a crime she didn't even commit? What about her?"
Tom
Murder is an unlawful killing.Well, admitting to condoning murder requires no choir and evidently does not appeal to your emotion. How does it feel to admittedly condone murder?
Congratulations.Well, I believe that voluntarily killing a human being is murder. I also believe that human life begins at conception. So from my perspective voluntary abortion is murder.
I don't think so. Not unless she caused the miscarriage on purpose.
I am strictly referring to voluntary abortion by choice only.
But if you through your own negligence a foetus dies (which you consider a person) then surely that's manslaughter? How can it not be, if abortion is murder?
Murder is an unlawful killing.
Since abortion is lawful....
Perhaps you would like to try again without the semantic pigeon chess?