Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gay and lesbian are sexual identities. God loves souls more than sexual identities. If and when the two conflict, the true God chooses the soul at the expense of sexual identity. Not the other way around.I believe God is love.
And because of this I believe God loves all his creatures.
Any thoughts?
If God loved everyone unconditionally, wouldn't that make that love largely meaningless?Any thoughts?
I believe God is love.
And because of this I believe God loves all his creatures.
Any thoughts?
I am not religious, have no God belief -- but I give you points for your post. If, as you believe, God "IS" love, then there is no other conclusion.I believe God is love.
And because of this I believe God loves all his creatures.
Any thoughts?
You are right. God is Unconditional Love. On the other hand, I would have used the term Kiddies instead of creatures. Of course, the true basic meaning of your statement is a very good one!!I believe God is love.
And because of this I believe God loves all his creatures.
Any thoughts?
Gay and lesbian are synonyms for homosexual. They're no more of an identity than heterosexual is; both are sexuality descriptors. Most people don't walk around saying "Hi, I'm straight/gay" and don't consider it to be anyone else's business. If we're to assume one's god loves heterosexuals, the same should hold true with homosexuals.Gay and lesbian are sexual identities. God loves souls more than sexual identities. If and when the two conflict, the true God chooses the soul at the expense of sexual identity. Not the other way around.
The same is true of gender identity.
God is Unconditional Love.
More knowledge lives beyond the surface. Perhaps, it's time to widen your view.Severely questionable.
I would never go here in my mind - the idea that God loves heterosexuals. It goes nowhere if spiritual development is the goal.If we're to assume one's god loves heterosexuals
I would never go here in my mind - the idea that God loves heterosexuals. It goes nowhere if spiritual development is the goal.
All this exaltation of non-traditional sexual and gender identities is secular activity for the secular domain. Even as a deeply religious person, I support the secular as a space to find reprieve from God’s judgment. However, invoking the name of God into it is going to be a ‘no’ from me.
More knowledge lives beyond the surface. Perhaps, it's time to widen your view.
That's what I see. It's very clear!!
When someone is identifying a group by their sexual orientation, you are not going to convince me to not call it an identity. It might be a weak identity for members of that group, but it’s an identity within the social sphere.My point is that if it's souls that matter, sexual orientation is irrelevant as it's not an identity.
I believe God is love.
And because of this I believe God loves all his creatures.
Any thoughts?
Gay and lesbian are sexual identities. God loves souls more than sexual identities. If and when the two conflict, the true God chooses the soul at the expense of sexual identity. Not the other way around.
The same is true of gender identity.
It would be weird to me to post my insights on a religious forum without believing in revelation.I'm so glad that you're here to tell us what God really thinks. He told you himself, did he?
Maybe "love is God" is better.I think the phrase "God is love" is incoherent.
Do you mean to say that God is loving?