• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I Could Care Less

Alien826

No religious beliefs
It seems that "aks" (for "ask") is a black thing. I've heard black people that otherwise speak very correctly say it that way. Maybe it's matter of dialog rather than an error. (I'm open to correction).

I was taught at school that the plural of "trade union" should be "trades union". It always seemed wrong to me, as "trades union" suggests multiple trades within a single union, and that "trade unions" would be better. I just looked it up and there still seems to be disagreement.

I hated it when "different than" started taking over from "different from". I looked it up and it seems that "different than" has been around for a long time and both have been considered to be correct. I still hate it though, and never say it.

I always thought "old timers syndrome" was a joke.

Incidentally double negatives are not considered wrong in all languages. In some they are considered to be emphasis. An example from school. "You don't never want to turn a tap off too hard. Not a tap you don't. Not never".
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
It seems that "aks" (for "ask") is a black thing. I've heard black people that otherwise speak very correctly say it that way. Maybe it's matter of dialog rather than an error. (I'm open to correction).
I'm glad you are open to correction.

“Aks” has origins in Old English and Germanic over a millennium ago, when it was a formal written form. In the first English Bible – the Coverdale Bible, from 1535 – Matthew 7:7 was written as “Axe and it shall be given you”, with royal approval.​
Beyond written English, “aks” was also the typical pronunciation in England’s south and in the Midlands. “Ask”, meanwhile, was more prevalent in the north and it is the latter that became the standard pronunciation.​
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
My wife is American, I'm Aussie and we confuse each other with these things at times. She says "could care less" and I say "couldn't care less". The most confusing though is "lucked out"... when she says it she means good luck but when I say it I mean bad luck.
"Could care less" is wrong even in America. ;)
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
Same.
As for "expresso", I'd never patronise an establishment that advertised such, darling.
I'm not gonna lie. I thought for years that's what it was...a shot of coffee that you could pound down to get the same effect as a full cup of regular...an express caffeine delivery shot.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
Last edited:

exchemist

Veteran Member
I could care less if people read this thread.

And other common phrases that are frequently said incorrectly. Are you guilty of any of these?

The "hone in" one was very prevalent when I was in Houston. It drove me nuts.

I have from time to time come across "I could care less", which strikes me as amazingly ignorant, but not quite as amusingly thick as "irregardless", which I think was a George W Bushism, along with putting food on your family etc. Another great one of his was pronouncing "nuclear" as "nookular", I remember.

But the article misses one of the worst, "the proof is in the pudding", which makes no sense, instead of "the proof of the pudding is in the eating".

Incidentally the title of the article is grammatically wrong. You don't "say things wrong", you say them wrongly.

Here endeth the rant from the English usage Nazi.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Same.
As for "expresso", I'd never patronise an establishment that advertised such, darling.

I think that would be different since it's a foreign word. It's like chiding someone for saying the capital of Italy is "Rome" when, in fact, it's "Roma."
 

Secret Chief

Very strong language
I think that would be different since it's a foreign word. It's like chiding someone for saying the capital of Italy is "Rome" when, in fact, it's "Roma."
Er no, it's just wrong. o_O
The fact that Florence is Firenze is irrelevant.

Oxford Dictionaries online states "The spelling "expresso" is not used in the original Italian and is strictly incorrect, although it is common." (in America).
 
Top