Trailblazer
Veteran Member
The reason and logic is used to assess the basic theology of the religion and determine if it makes sense to you. For example, does Progressive Revelation make sense to you? Is it logical?What reason and logic? You keep on saying there is objective evidence but you haven't said what, now there's reason and logic but haven't set it out.
The objective evidence is everything that surrounds the Revelation of Baha’u’llah, including who He was as a Person (His character); His mission on earth; the history of His Cause, from the time He appeared moving forward; the scriptures that He wrote; what His authorized Interpreter wrote; what others have written about the Baha’i Faith; the Bible prophecies that He fulfilled, as well as prophecies of other religions that He fulfilled; predictions He made that have come to pass; the religion that He established (followers) all over the world and what they have done and are doing now.
The fact that many people have not heard of it does not mean it is not clear. The fact that many people claimed to be messengers of God but weren’t does not mean that Baha’u’llah wasn’t.Baha’u’llah is not a clear message from any god. Many people haven't even heard of it. Anyway it's just another person claiming to be a messenger. There cannot be and free will involved unless everybody knows that the message is genuine - clearly most people don't think it is.
Free will is a nonsense concept with respect to an omnipotent, omniscient creator, anyway.
First we investigate Baha’u’llah and then we use free will to choose to believe in Him IF what we investigated indicates to us that He was a Messenger of God. .
God gave us free will so we would be free to act on our own behalf. The fact that God is omnipotent and omniscient has nothing to do with that. God could override our free will if He wanted to but He doesn’t. God knows what we will do before we do it but God does not cause us to do it.
We really do not have any original scriptures of any religions prior to the Baha’i Faith and that is part of the problem, so all we can do is read what most likely to be the sayings of those Prophets/Messengers. Buddhists have the Sutras, Hindus the Gita, Jews the Torah, Christians the Bible, Muslims the Qur’an, etc.So you keep claiming - where is the evidence of these original messages and how do you know they are the originals?
God did not hide it in just one religion, the message is in all the major religions, but only one religion is the current one because religious dispensations are always abrogated when a new Messenger of God appears. As such, Baha’u’llah abrogated the dispensation of Muhammad.n what way exactly? We are back to the same question of why a god would hide its message in one of the many religions. Does it really expect everyone on the planet to look in detail at every different religion, cult, and sect? Life's too short.
The upshot of this is that there is no need to look at all the older Messengers/religions because they are not pertinent to the present time in history. Their spiritual verities are just as true as ever, but their social teachings and laws are out of date and their message is not the message for this day. Their messages were needed in past ages, but they are not needed now because those religions already accomplished what was necessary in past ages. Baha’u’llah brought a new message, the oneness of mankind and world unity, and that is what humanity needs to focus on during His dispensation. Humanity evolves and the world we live in changes over time and that is why we need new Messengers and new religions in every age.
God did provide a clear message through Baha’u’llah. You cannot blame God if more people do not know about it. At most you can blame the Baha’is for not getting the message out to more people, but once you have that message that ball is in your court, because God considers it your responsibility to investigate it. That is the best God can do because God is not going to come swooping down and tell you what to believe.But (if this god exists) the confusion is fundamentally its fault for not providing a clear message. Blaming people for not rooting through every religion on the planet to see if they may be wrong and some other faith may be right, is unjust and unfair.