PatrickLeo
Member
I would assume the creator of existence itself to have as many faces as anyone can conceive.
I would also find that rather inconsequential.
It is a form of 'idolatry' as per its definition.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I would assume the creator of existence itself to have as many faces as anyone can conceive.
I would also find that rather inconsequential.
Trouble is, "religion" is a very ill-defined concept and it may well be that there is no useful consensus to be found anymore.I would say that any form of fantasy is quasi-religion
That is, frankly, a matter of perception as opposed to fact.It is a form of 'idolatry' as per its definition.
Trouble is, "religion" is a very ill-defined concept and it may well be that there is no useful consensus to be found anymore.
Many people, including quite a few supernaturalist dogmatists, treat it as a pejorative as a matter of course.
Others (myself included) see worth in the concept and attempt to treat it with respect. But it may be a lost cause now.
That is, frankly, a matter of perception as opposed to fact.
Many are.Are facts objective?
Many are.
Idolatry, however, is mainly a matter of judgement.
Others (myself included) see worth in the concept and attempt to treat it with respect. But it may be a lost cause now.
It seems to me that the best way of dealing with that is by refusing to take it very seriously.2 billion people of Planet Earth accusing the other 2 billion of idolatry. Christians blaming the muslims. Muslims blaming the christians. Jews blaming both muslims and christians.
Heaven forbid that it is metaphorical, eh? LOL. This strong atheist isn't too impressed with the OP.Atheists care?
But it is not what it seems, therefore it is NOT idolatry. Nowhere has any Muslim ever indicated that god literally has a face that we can look upon. I'd be quite happy to be shown to be wrong on this, but it doesn't ring any bells with me. It is essentially a straw-man.Which makes their idolatry of the god-concept and of the Qur'an all the more ironic and remarkable.
Unfortunately, it's just not a very good question. There are much bigger fish to fry in Islamic theology. This is a minnow.So i am a troll because i ask simple logic questions?
2 billion people of Planet Earth accusing the other 2 billion of idolatry. Christians blaming the muslims. Muslims blaming the christians. Jews blaming both muslims and christians.
You should ask those who wrote the New Testament. Oh, yes, they aren't alive. It is a long sorrowful story, mortal men, who relied on other mortal men who made up stories to explain unfathomable events, wrote what they thought to be God's truth. Will we ever know the real stories?Like the way Jesus Plagiarized the Jewish scriptures????
I've got to largely go with the Muslim take on this. I suspect, but cannot prove, that the Stone is no more an idol to most Muslims than the millions of statues in India are idols to most Hindus. To me, idolatry would be the case if people prayed to the stone for positive intervention in their lives, etc. Or if they set up the Stone as a substitute or equal of deity. But to merely reverence it seems to me no different in principle than the way many Christians reverence various works of art, such as the Sistine Chapel ceiling. At least, that's my take on this.
Define idolatry.
Like the way Jesus Plagiarized the Jewish scriptures????
Doesn't that mean that any theistic faith will be idolatric according to all other such faiths until and unless they agree that they do, in fact, worship the same god?Worshipping something man made.
Examples: 1. If I prayed to a statue.
2. I play video games nearly every waking hour, excluding god from my life.
The poster claimed Mohammad plagiarized Judaism, well that's what Jesus did also, they both started new religions based on Judaism.