• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If Adam had not sinned.

waitasec

Veteran Member
For the immediate response....yeah....it seems so.
Live a sinful life and die in sin....die in spirit.
One follows the other.

But going back to Genesis.....the word 'sin' does not appear in my copy until Chapter 4.
romans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned—

a contradiction it seems...
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
romans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned—

a contradiction it seems...

This and another thread are now running, dead parallel.
I quote myself....

"I don't see knowledge as a failing.

The fall of man has nothing to do with sin.

If sin would be separation from God?....all have sinned...born that way.
If sin is transgression and God leaves you for it...
If sin is transgression against another, and God leaves you for it...

But I don't see acquisition of knowledge as sin.
And you need that knowledge to walk with grace...in heaven.

What you do with your knowledge...your sense of wisdom....your grace...
that could make a difference.

Kinda hard to walk gracefully with a crutch under your arm."
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
Nay, Adam is a chosen son of God.
Born like another man, and would die like any other man.

gen 2:7 Then the LORD God formed a man[c] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
gen 2:7 Then the LORD God formed a man[c] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

I've been waiting for this.

This one quote throws most people in the wrong direction...every time.

My copy does not say...'formed a man'.
simply....'formed man'.

In all fairness, my copy goes on to say...
and God planted a garden eastward in Eden: and there He put the man
whom He had formed.

At one point it appears the book speaks of Man as a species...
and in the very next line refocuses upon one man that God relocates to a setting of ideal living conditions.

That Adam is made of dust does not make him unique or special.
That much happens to all of us.

That Adam has been chosen and relocated, then to walk with God...yes.
Adam was chosen...and the first to walk with God.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
still...

you are saying that the account of the creation of man in chapter 1 is evolution...
what does chapter 2 vs. 7 mean? did he form adam or mankind?
why would he breath life into it... is that evolution or not?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
still...

you are saying that the account of the creation of man in chapter 1 is evolution...
what does chapter 2 vs. 7 mean? did he form adam or mankind?
why would he breath life into it... is that evolution or not?

Chapter Two is manipulation.

All men are formed.
The breath of life is spiritual.

For having walked with God...Adam became unique.
Man as a species, now has a notable change in direction.
Even though, we still call ourselves animal.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
Chapter Two is manipulation.

All men are formed.
The breath of life is spiritual.

For having walked with God...Adam became unique.
Man as a species, now has a notable change in direction.
Even though, we still call ourselves animal.

there is no scripture supporting your claim...none.
nice try though...
 

Heathen Hammer

Nope, you're still wrong
Yeah, I am seeing interpolation into vast apologetic puzzles the farther we go. Scripture is very clear, the Tree of Life would have granted immortality of the physical kind, God is never seen to actually teach the first two people anything, and the full consequences even as presented in the story itself, is never explained to Adam and Eve until it is too late. This isn't rocket science, guys. Read the words, understand, conclude. Problem solved; this was a setup from the beginning.
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Yeah, I am seeing interpolation into vast apologetic puzzles the farther we go. Scripture is very clear, the Tree of Life would have granted immortality of the physical kind, God is never seen to actually teach the first two people anything, and the full consequences even as presented in the story itself, is never explained to Adam and Eve until it is too late. This isn't rocket science, guys. Read the words, understand, conclude. Problem solved; this was a setup from the beginning.

Except for that one item...all good.

The tree of knowledge was a step up...as God did say...
'...they have become as us....'

The tree of life would also be a step up...spiritual life.
Know-how first....then we walk in heaven.
 

Heathen Hammer

Nope, you're still wrong
Except for that one item...all good.

The tree of knowledge was a step up...as God did say...
'...they have become as us....'

The tree of life would also be a step up...spiritual life.
Know-how first....then we walk in heaven.
'Spiritual life' is an unfounded term. As has been shown. "Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil. Now, lest he put forth his hand, and also take of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever..." is the full text, Gen 3:22. Tch tch, cherry picking.

LIVE FOREVER.

I really don't need to repeat this more than it already has been. Or do I?
 

krsnaraja

Active Member
'Spiritual life' is an unfounded term. As has been shown. "Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil. Now, lest he put forth his hand, and also take of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever..." is the full text, Gen 3:22. Tch tch, cherry picking.

LIVE FOREVER.

I really don't need to repeat this more than it already has been. Or do I?

The Genesis of the Bible is Cosmology!
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Yeah, I am seeing interpolation into vast apologetic puzzles the farther we go. Scripture is very clear, the Tree of Life would have granted immortality of the physical kind, God is never seen to actually teach the first two people anything, and the full consequences even as presented in the story itself, is never explained to Adam and Eve until it is too late. This isn't rocket science, guys. Read the words, understand, conclude. Problem solved; this was a setup from the beginning.

The difference between immortality and everlasting life is that the immortal one is always death proof or can't ever be destroyed.

Mortal Adam was not offered immortality [life within himself], but everlasting life on earth meaning still dependent on exterior things like eating and drinking and breathing in order to go on living.

The immortal need no food nor air but mortals do even if they are granted everlasting life on earth because of obedience to God.

Sure the consequences are explained.
Please notice what God taught Adam at Genesis 2v17.
What is not clear about that verse?

Eve understood because please notice how she answers the serpent at Genesis 3v2,3. What is not clear about that verse?
 
Top