And other Gospels have other claims. You can support almost any belief with the Bible since it is quite often on both sides of an issue.
Yes, Baha'is find the ones that support their claims. And Christians find the ones that support theirs. And for Jews, neither of them have fulfilled the Messianic prophesies.
I think the point is, it will be visible to all, it is not something that happens so that you would not notice it.
Yes, every eye will see it. But, since, hardly anyone saw the coming of the Baha'i prophet, they focus on "He will come as a thief in the night."
Sorry, I don't think so, for example because:
who also said, Men, Galileans, why do you stand looking up to the heaven? This Jesus, the One being taken from you into the heaven, will come in the way you saw Him going into the heaven.
Acts 1:11
"This Jesus"? And at the end of Revelation it says, 12 “Look, I am coming soon! 16 “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you[
a] this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.” 20 He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.
Plus, through out Revelation it is the "Lamb" that is coming back. The best Baha'is can do with that is claim that the Bab was the "Lamb that was slain."
But the question I always ask Baha'is is... Where in any Scriptures of any religion does the promised one come back and not fix things?
Oh wait a second, Jesus often referred to himself as the son of man. So if he said that the son of man will return, that is him predicting his own return.
The problem for Baha'is is they have to show that it is not Jesus coming back... but that it is Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah coming. Three "Messiahs". And for the Jews, that makes four Messiahs have to be predicted in their Scriptures.
Can you give an example? I have read the whole Bible and I can't remember such use of clouds.
That's how Baha'is interpret "clouds". Here's a
quote from Abdul Baha...
Although the divine teachings are truth and reality, yet with the passage of time thick clouds envelop and obscure them. These clouds are imitations and superstitions; they are not the fundamentals. Then the Sun of Truth, the Word of God, arises again, shines forth once more in the glory of its power and disperses the enveloping darkness.
For a long time the divine precepts of the effulgent Word were obscured by clouds of superstition and error until Bahá’u’lláh appeared upon the horizon of humanity, rent the shadows, scattered the clouds and revealed anew the foundations of the teachings of God.
You're contradicting yourself. This verse actually says he will come.
ESV translation:
"Yet a little while and the world will see me no more, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live."
16 "A little while, and you will see me no longer; and again a little while, and you will see me."
And in the Gospel stories, they did see him again. But not in the
Baha'i interpretation of the Gospels.
From letters written on behalf of the Guardian
We do not believe that there was a bodily resurrection after the Crucifixion of Christ, but that there was a time after His Ascension when His disciples perceived spiritually His true greatness and realized He was eternal in being. This is what has been reported symbolically in the New Testament and been misunderstood. His eating with His disciples after resurrection is the same thing.
9 October 1947 to an individual believer
Baha'is have the physical body of Jesus dead and gone. It didn't come back to life. But that's not what the Gospel writers say...
Act 1:1 ...I wrote about all that Jesus began to do and to teach 2 until the day he was taken up to heaven, after giving instructions through the Holy Spirit to the apostles he had chosen. 3 After his suffering, he presented himself to them and gave many convincing proofs that he was alive.
Then there is the verse that Jesus tells one of the disciples to touch him and see that he has flesh and bone and is not a ghost. It all depends what a person wants to believe. But, it makes me wonder, why believe either one?