Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Ok, please provide the biblical or other evidence that you think show Jesus was about governing people and to what ends/purpose?Governing people.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ok, please provide the biblical or other evidence that you think show Jesus was about governing people and to what ends/purpose?Governing people.
Truely, THAT AM I (Ayamatmā Brahman - This self is Brahman, the one entity which constitutes all things in the universe, there is no God). But you forget that I am a Hindu; and in Hinduism, we are allowed to have our own interpretations. We are not bound to follow any book. I do not believe in existence of 'Personality of Godhead' (whatever that means, but shows clearly that you have taken it from Prabhupada/Hare-Krishna translation), soul or supersoul, being free from misconception of duality (asmi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ). Heart is a organ of the body and its function is to pump blood.If it is not dualistic, ie., transcending the pairs of opposites, it implies the Supersoul.
Atma (without the elongation of the 'a' at the end) can mean Supersoul!
SB 1.9.42 Srimad-Bhagavatam
TEXT 42
tam imam aham ajaṁ śarīra-bhājāṁ
hṛdi hṛdi dhiṣṭhitam ātma-kalpitānām
pratidṛśam iva naikadhārkam ekaṁ
samadhi-gato 'smi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ
tam—that Personality of Godhead; imam—now present before me; aham—I; ajam—the unborn; śarīra-bhājām—of the conditioned soul; hṛdi—in the heart; hṛdi—in the heart; dhiṣṭhitam—situated; ātma—the Supersoul; kalpitānām—of the speculators; pratidṛśam—in every direction; iva—like; na ekadhā—not one; arkam—the sun; ekam—one only; samadhi-gataḥ asmi—I have undergone trance in meditation; vidhūta—being freed from; bheda-mohaḥ—misconception of duality.
Of course I know you are Indian but I understand you are an atheist one.Truely, THAT AM I (Ayamatmā Brahman - This self is Brahman, the one entity which constitutes all things in the universe, there is no God). But you forget that I am a Hindu; and in Hinduism, we are allowed to have our own interpretations. We are not bound to follow any book. I do not believe in existence of 'Personality of Godhead' (whatever that means, but shows clearly that you have taken it from Prabhupada/Hare-Krishna translation), soul or supersoul, being free from misconception of duality (asmi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ). Heart is a organ of the body and its function is to pump blood.
No problem if others believe that way. I do not. That is another Hindu stance. We are capable of standing on our own.Of course I know you are Indian but I understand you are an atheist one.
So here are some links to other sites showing Atma means soul.
Atma or Atman, the Individual Self in Hinduism
Atma
Well you certainly do stand on your own now, but that's ok, in the days of zenzero, you were not atheist iirc.No problem if others believe that way. I do not. That is another Hindu stance. We are capable of standing on our own.
Just like the coin has two sides, I too have two sides. That of a strong atheist and if a follower of Abrahamic religions or a theist Hindu engages me, then I reply in his/her language.Well you certainly do stand on your own now, but that's ok, in the days of zenzero, you were not atheist iirc.
So what do you think of the teaching of Jesus as is recorded in the Gospel of John?Just like the coin has two sides, I too have two sides. That of a strong atheist and if a follower of Abrahamic religions or a theist Hindu engages me, then I reply in his/her language.
We do not know who wrote any Gospel, names were attached to them only later. Jesus or gospels are not relevant for me.So what do you think of the teaching of Jesus as is recorded in the Gospel of John?
That was not the question, it is not who wrote it that is important, it is what it had to say that is.We do not know who wrote any Gospel, names were attached to them only later. Jesus or gospels are not relevant for me.
I am a Hindu. What Hinduism or any other Indic religion says (Jainism, Buddhism or Sikhism), is relevant to me.
I think that is the worst.So I am asking what you thought of the Gospel of John writings?
That is not what I was asking, I was asking what do you you think about what Jesus taught? If you have not read the gospel of John, not a problem, you can't answer and that is understood.I think that is the worst.
"According to Delbert Burkett, the Gospel of John is the only gospel to call Jesus God .."
"Like the three other gospels, it is anonymous, although it identifies an unnamed "disciple whom Jesus loved" as the source of its traditions. It most likely arose within a "Johannine community", and – as it is closely related in style and content to the three Johannine epistles – most scholars treat the four books, along with the Book of Revelation, as a single corpus of Johannine literature, albeit not by the same author."Gospel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Gospel of John - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
As an atheist Hindu, I do not accept the existence of any God or Goddess.That is not what I was asking, I was asking what do you you think about what Jesus taught? If you have not read the gospel of John, not a problem, you can't answer and that is understood.
Ok then, thank you, got that.As an atheist Hindu, I do not accept the existence of any God or Goddess.
What Jesus taught was the same as what other religious teachers taught before and after his time.
Take for example, Zoroaster or Vivekannda. Nothing new.
Hi rubi,Hi everyone, I'm Jewish, and I'm here to engage in a respectful and open discussion about the role of Jesus Christ. As someone who doesn't believe in Christ, I hold the perspective that both Christianity and Islam have been orchestrated by God to spread monotheism.
Recently, I had a thought-provoking discussion with a spokesman from a Christian institute on youtube, and it led me to ponder how difficult to discern Christ's true nature without understanding Hebrew.
Just for the sake of discussion, if Christ wasn't the Messiah, what was he?
I do apologize if anyone is offended, but I think we should have an open, respectful, and tolerant discussion about anything.
I look forward to hearing different perspectives and engaging in a thoughtful exchange of ideas.