• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If Christ wasn't the messiah, what was he?

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
If it is not dualistic, ie., transcending the pairs of opposites, it implies the Supersoul.

Atma (without the elongation of the 'a' at the end) can mean Supersoul!

SB 1.9.42 Srimad-Bhagavatam
TEXT 42
tam imam aham ajaṁ śarīra-bhājāṁ
hṛdi hṛdi dhiṣṭhitam ātma-kalpitānām
pratidṛśam iva naikadhārkam ekaṁ
samadhi-gato 'smi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ

tam—that Personality of Godhead; imam—now present before me; aham—I; ajam—the unborn; śarīra-bhājām—of the conditioned soul; hṛdi—in the heart; hṛdi—in the heart; dhiṣṭhitam—situated; ātma—the Supersoul; kalpitānām—of the speculators; pratidṛśam—in every direction; iva—like; na ekadhā—not one; arkam—the sun; ekam—one only; samadhi-gataḥ asmi—I have undergone trance in meditation; vidhūta—being freed from; bheda-mohaḥ—misconception of duality.
Truely, THAT AM I (Ayamatmā Brahman - This self is Brahman, the one entity which constitutes all things in the universe, there is no God). But you forget that I am a Hindu; and in Hinduism, we are allowed to have our own interpretations. We are not bound to follow any book. I do not believe in existence of 'Personality of Godhead' (whatever that means, but shows clearly that you have taken it from Prabhupada/Hare-Krishna translation), soul or supersoul, being free from misconception of duality (asmi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ). Heart is a organ of the body and its function is to pump blood. ;)
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Truely, THAT AM I (Ayamatmā Brahman - This self is Brahman, the one entity which constitutes all things in the universe, there is no God). But you forget that I am a Hindu; and in Hinduism, we are allowed to have our own interpretations. We are not bound to follow any book. I do not believe in existence of 'Personality of Godhead' (whatever that means, but shows clearly that you have taken it from Prabhupada/Hare-Krishna translation), soul or supersoul, being free from misconception of duality (asmi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ). Heart is a organ of the body and its function is to pump blood. ;)
Of course I know you are Indian but I understand you are an atheist one.

So here are some links to other sites showing Atma means soul.

Atma or Atman, the Individual Self in Hinduism

Atma

 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Well you certainly do stand on your own now, but that's ok, in the days of zenzero, you were not atheist iirc.
Just like the coin has two sides, I too have two sides. That of a strong atheist and if a follower of Abrahamic religions or a theist Hindu engages me, then I reply in his/her language. :D
 
Last edited:

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Just like the coin has two sides, I too have two sides. That of a strong atheist and if a follower of Abrahamic religions or a theist Hindu engages me, then I reply in his/her language. :D
So what do you think of the teaching of Jesus as is recorded in the Gospel of John?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
So what do you think of the teaching of Jesus as is recorded in the Gospel of John?
We do not know who wrote any Gospel, names were attached to them only later. Jesus or gospels are not relevant for me.
I am a Hindu. What Hinduism or any other Indic religion says (Jainism, Buddhism or Sikhism), is relevant to me.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
We do not know who wrote any Gospel, names were attached to them only later. Jesus or gospels are not relevant for me.
I am a Hindu. What Hinduism or any other Indic religion says (Jainism, Buddhism or Sikhism), is relevant to me.
That was not the question, it is not who wrote it that is important, it is what it had to say that is.
You said in the post I responded to that, "like the coin has two sides, I too have two sides. That of a strong atheist and if a follower of Abrahamic religions or a theist Hindu engages me, then I reply in his/her language."
So I am asking what you thought of the Gospel of John writings?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
So I am asking what you thought of the Gospel of John writings?
I think that is the worst.
"According to Delbert Burkett, the Gospel of John is the only gospel to call Jesus God .."
"Like the three other gospels, it is anonymous, although it identifies an unnamed "disciple whom Jesus loved" as the source of its traditions. It most likely arose within a "Johannine community", and – as it is closely related in style and content to the three Johannine epistles – most scholars treat the four books, along with the Book of Revelation, as a single corpus of Johannine literature, albeit not by the same author."
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
I think that is the worst.
"According to Delbert Burkett, the Gospel of John is the only gospel to call Jesus God .."
"Like the three other gospels, it is anonymous, although it identifies an unnamed "disciple whom Jesus loved" as the source of its traditions. It most likely arose within a "Johannine community", and – as it is closely related in style and content to the three Johannine epistles – most scholars treat the four books, along with the Book of Revelation, as a single corpus of Johannine literature, albeit not by the same author."
That is not what I was asking, I was asking what do you you think about what Jesus taught? If you have not read the gospel of John, not a problem, you can't answer and that is understood.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
That is not what I was asking, I was asking what do you you think about what Jesus taught? If you have not read the gospel of John, not a problem, you can't answer and that is understood.
As an atheist Hindu, I do not accept the existence of any God or Goddess.
What Jesus taught was the same as what other religious teachers taught before and after his time.
Take for example, Zoroaster or Vivekannda. Nothing new.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
As an atheist Hindu, I do not accept the existence of any God or Goddess.
What Jesus taught was the same as what other religious teachers taught before and after his time.
Take for example, Zoroaster or Vivekannda. Nothing new.
Ok then, thank you, got that.
 

TrueBeliever37

Well-Known Member
Hi everyone, I'm Jewish, and I'm here to engage in a respectful and open discussion about the role of Jesus Christ. As someone who doesn't believe in Christ, I hold the perspective that both Christianity and Islam have been orchestrated by God to spread monotheism.

Recently, I had a thought-provoking discussion with a spokesman from a Christian institute on youtube, and it led me to ponder how difficult to discern Christ's true nature without understanding Hebrew.

Just for the sake of discussion, if Christ wasn't the Messiah, what was he?

I do apologize if anyone is offended, but I think we should have an open, respectful, and tolerant discussion about anything.
I look forward to hearing different perspectives and engaging in a thoughtful exchange of ideas.
Hi rubi,

This is what I believe. He WAS the Messiah. He was YHWH dwelling in that fleshly body. YHWH came down to tread upon the high places of the earth. Just like he said he would do in Micah 1:3-5 With the high places in Judah, being Jerusalem as pointed out in verse 5.

A Son was born who would be called the mighty God, and the everlasting Father as prophesied in Isaiah 9:6. He was the image (the body) of the invisible God.

His true name is actually YHWSH (meaning YHWH saves) as foretold in Zechariah 6:11-13

I believe Mainstream Christianity has it wrong. There is no Trinity. There is only one God, and that one God is a Spirit, and he is holy. So the Holy Spirit isn't another person it's YHWH. YHWH didn't have blood to shed for man's sin, so he took on a body that could die. He was the Father of that body, so he called it his Son, but it wasn't another person. It was YHWH himself dwelling in a fleshly body which he sacrificed for our sins.

Of course, since he was in a body like ours, it would therefore be subject to temptation. While in the flesh, he had to call on the Spirit for strength to overcome and be the perfect sacrifice. He was providing us with the example of what we have to do to overcome. Because of no sin, YHWH raised that body up as a glorified spiritual body. He then ascended and took his right to the throne. YHWH would no longer just appear as a cloud above the mercy seat. He now had a glorified spiritual body and would sit on the throne, to rule forever.
 

ChieftheCef

Well-Known Member
Mark 2:5

“When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralyzed man, ‘Son, your sins are forgiven.’“

Sins were forgiven before Jesus died nullifying the idea that Jesus had to die to forgive sins.
 

ChieftheCef

Well-Known Member
Mathew 16:28

"Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom." “

Let’s think about it this way: Jesus said the disciples would be around and they aren’t.
 

ChieftheCef

Well-Known Member
Genesis 4:16-17

“So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden. Cain made love to his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Enoch.”

Cain’s wife came from a town that had already existed prior to Eden.
 

ChieftheCef

Well-Known Member
The ark was 500 feet big, how could any ship hold a breeding population (which you actually need to make a species in the wild, not just two organisms but thousands)? What about plants?
 

ChieftheCef

Well-Known Member
The word for sphere is dur (circle), not galgal (sphere).

Isaiah 40:22 "He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in."

That’s this

AD_4nXfmQJwc8fK8XBQsk5xQbOlX6T4FjXgwV4JcZoIgOm16wHqGxM1pA0i2vnug5NYR6-L6Uch2_5CpGxoQeoF99_PmkkW5KPxVC0lv9sdMRPmmZjqH43wcrSeH_N49WS8VFx8FIb6bQ6ixVk9JH21PXzp_nR8V


It’s shaped like a roll deodorant stick and it’s the Hebrews conception of reality.It's entirely wrong and we can know, easily, because you can’t look out to the mountains past any body of water of sufficient size.
 

ChieftheCef

Well-Known Member
Besides these badness is composed of goodness. Bad is good and good is bad. Death leaves room for life, damage heals back stronger, the world runs on wastes. You writers say that badness is not to be tolerated but it's not true.
 
Top