Why do you say that?That kind of logic requires a ridiculous definition of 'omnipotent." I'm not interested in semantic arguments,
Every case of suffering that's relieved by a helping hand (or pharmaceutical pain relief) is suffering that was entirely possible to address... and that God failed to address.
So relieving a person's suffering denies them the full benefit of their "learning process?"Life as a learning process, with suffering as its challenge, makes sense without playing with words and their definition. That's good enough for me.
Take a look at Maslow's heirarchy of needs sometime. Our best opportunities happen when our basic needs are met, and we can't effectively work on self-actualization while we're lacking - suffering - in more foundational areas of our lives.