I think it disproves a god who cares about all humans equally.
How come? Would you explain you reasoning?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think it disproves a god who cares about all humans equally.
I think that's a fair assumption, yes.I am not sure I understand you.
Do you mean that God can not teach us just as effectively in some other way?
That was Epicurus's starting point, of course.
And Aquinas's too, but his 'free will' explanation is simply a rationalizing, albeit a famous one.
I don't think Epicurus or Aquinas or hard-eyed reason matter at such times. The question is, what helps to deal with the grief. If faith can do that, I suspect the question answers itself.
Without the potential of suffering and imperfection there would be no free will. Joy and sadness, Good vrs evil etc.
Part of our suffering is a consequence of Lucifers rebellion against God.
I haven't read all the posts, but do you have a way of thinking that gets you to reason why, if there is a god, he, it, they or she (however you believe), allows or causes suffering?I was working amidst a rural community and was invited to dinner with one of my workmates and her husband. My colleague has just been diagnosed with cancer for the second time in her life. Its a tough time for her but she’s dealing with it really well. She had grown up Christian but in her twenties several people she knew died in short succession. This led her to conclude there was no God. “Why would God allow such suffering?” She feels as if she’s coping just fine now without believing in God and she certainly appears to be.
She asked me as a declared theist “If there is a God, why would He allow such suffering?” As an invited guest of a colleague with cancer I felt it best to empathise with her perspective and listen without offering a theistic view.
The belief that suffering rules out the existence of God is something I’ve heard from atheists and agnostics before. Although I’ve suffered in life from time to time, its never led me to question God’s existence. In fact I’ve just had a really tough month or so for which I’m grateful. Admittedly I’m not wrestling with a cancer diagnosis or the loss of a loved one.
So I’m curious as to how others view suffering and whether it affects their beliefs about God positively or negatively. If a Creator God exists why didn’t He do a better job of designing the universe? If we suffer, shouldn’t we see it as an opportunity to develop and attain new insights and strength?
I’ve put this in the general debates section to allow freedom of expression. I’m wanting to better understand why this is such a critical issue for so many people rather than debate. Thanks in advance for those who drop by to offer their sincere thoughts about how suffering affects their faith.
I do not believe that suffering rules out the existence of God, but I do believe that it rules out the existence of a loving and benevolent God. Religious apologists try to make this work by saying that suffering is for our benefit, but it is STILL suffering, and not everyone benefits from suffering, as many will attest to. I believe it is arrogant to tell those people that they really are benefiting but they don't realize it, as who are they to speak for other people? I will remind you what Baha'u'lah wrote:The belief that suffering rules out the existence of God is something I’ve heard from atheists and agnostics before. Although I’ve suffered in life from time to time, its never led me to question God’s existence. In fact I’ve just had a really tough month or so for which I’m grateful. Admittedly I’m not wrestling with a cancer diagnosis or the loss of a loved one.
The existence of suffering affects my beliefs about God in a negative fashion. I do not believe that God is all He is cracked up to be by Christians and Baha'is -- loving, merciful, and kind. I cannot believe that because it flies in the face of the evidence, namely all the suffering I see in the world. My logical mind will not accommodate such a belief. Admittedly my beliefs are affected by my own lifelong suffering which no doubt will continue till the end of my life, but I realize that many others have suffered much more than I have, although only God knows who suffers most.So I’m curious as to how others view suffering and whether it affects their beliefs about God positively or negatively. If a Creator God exists why didn’t He do a better job of designing the universe? If we suffer, shouldn’t we see it as an opportunity to develop and attain new insights and strength?
I think that's a fair assumption, yes.
Honestly, anecdotally, most of the people who call themselves atheists or agnostics who bring this topic up are just bringing it up to debate. I think its obvious because God or the existence of God is no more a "critical issue" as you put it for them. But there some who became agnostic or atheistic because they went through this question and could not find a solution. They use this as a debate tactic for a long long time, but they left the theology because this suffering could not be reconciled with the existence of an all knowing God. Them I actually find honestly bringing it up.
Anyway, you will not find a proper response to this other than apologetics. Theodicy has been a topic for way too long but none of those are like revelation, they are apologetics.
The issue with me is suffering does not affect my beliefs about God. It makes me question nonsense in theology. I dont know if that makes any sense to you. The conviction there is a God to me comes from very different deductions so that is established and well grounded. Its unshakable. Theodicy brings about questions about various things, but not the existence of God. Maybe about what some scripture tries to state in it, and if it makes any sense, or if some latter persons exegesis of a part of a scripture is valid or not.
Why continue with it?I certainly take a pragmatic approach to faith. If it works then go with it. If it doesn't, why continue with it.
Regardless, Christians aren't promised anywhere in the Bible or through tradition that they will die nice peaceful deaths of old age. Just the contrary, actually.I don't think the problem was death per se, but rather how and when it happened.
If you had really suffered maybe you would know why, but no man can know the suffering of another man unless he has walked a mile in his moccasins.Yeah, I'm trying to better understand why suffering is a deal breaker for some who would deny the existence of God.
That's right, only Allah knows, although there are many religious people who believe that they know the answer.why Allah let people suffer I simply do not know the answer to it at this moment in time. Only Allah know that answer.
In order to make that deduction you have to assume that there is a more effective, or at least just as effective, and kinder way than suffering to teach us.Alright. That puts a limit on God's potence though. Most theists don't like saying that God can't do something.
This was started today and it's already six pages long? I'm just wondering if there isn't suffering in the spiritual worlds of God, why here? If it is for spiritual growth, then we don't "grow" in the spiritual worlds? Things just seem too random. People can die or suffer from so many different things. God kills off his followers in the same ways he kills off those that don't believe in him.I was working amidst a rural community and was invited to dinner with one of my workmates and her husband. My colleague has just been diagnosed with cancer for the second time in her life. Its a tough time for her but she’s dealing with it really well. She had grown up Christian but in her twenties several people she knew died in short succession. This led her to conclude there was no God. “Why would God allow such suffering?” She feels as if she’s coping just fine now without believing in God and she certainly appears to be.
She asked me as a declared theist “If there is a God, why would He allow such suffering?” As an invited guest of a colleague with cancer I felt it best to empathise with her perspective and listen without offering a theistic view.
The belief that suffering rules out the existence of God is something I’ve heard from atheists and agnostics before. Although I’ve suffered in life from time to time, its never led me to question God’s existence. In fact I’ve just had a really tough month or so for which I’m grateful. Admittedly I’m not wrestling with a cancer diagnosis or the loss of a loved one.
So I’m curious as to how others view suffering and whether it affects their beliefs about God positively or negatively. If a Creator God exists why didn’t He do a better job of designing the universe? If we suffer, shouldn’t we see it as an opportunity to develop and attain new insights and strength?
I’ve put this in the general debates section to allow freedom of expression. I’m wanting to better understand why this is such a critical issue for so many people rather than debate. Thanks in advance for those who drop by to offer their sincere thoughts about how suffering affects their faith.
Sadly, the only answer I can come up with is that God does not have all those characteristics.It might be easier to answer were the question expanded to," if God exists and has the characteristics I've been taught, why does He allow suffering?"
Regardless, Christians aren't promised anywhere in the Bible or through tradition that they will die nice peaceful deaths of old age. Just the contrary, actually.
I understand that. Grief and loss also tends to bring out anger.I don't think it is about what has been promised though. It is about what you feel. If you feel there is something unfair about going through certain events, it might be hard to see how a kind and caring God could allow them to happen.
So in the spiritual world rebelling against God is possible? And was the leader of those that rebelled, along with his followers were cast down to Earth? Or can they still roam around in the spiritual world? Then one day God will destroy them along with all the humans that didn't obey God? Then what? No more necessity for pain and suffering? No more free will? No more good versus evil? There will only be good? Then why did God think it was such a good idea to do it now? What did it really accomplish? Didn't God know who would believe and follow him, and who would reject him? But God wanted it to play out anyway?Without the potential of suffering and imperfection there would be no free will. Joy and sadness, Good vrs evil etc.
Part of our suffering is a consequence of Lucifers rebellion against God.
In order to make that deduction you have to assume that there is a more effective, or at least just as effective, and kinder way than suffering to teach us.
I don't see how one can possibly make that assumption, so I take the evidence of the world as it is and reason my way to a plausible explanation.
There is absolutely NO WAY I will ever catch up on this thread given I already had a long list of posts to answer from other threads, but I put those aside for the time being because this is my subject. I only happened to see your post in passing, and I am glad that I did.This was started today and it's already six pages long?
Dontcha know the Baha'i drill on this? We are supposed to suffer and grow spiritually in THIS world so we will be spiritual when we get to the the spiritual world. But we are also supposed to continue to progress in the spiritual world, from the starting point we were at when we died.I'm just wondering if there isn't suffering in the spiritual worlds of God, why here? If it is for spiritual growth, then we don't "grow" in the spiritual worlds? Things just seem too random. People can die or suffer from so many different things. God kills off his followers in the same ways he kills off those that don't believe in him.