sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
But not inevitable and charity is a much better use of funds.Not really .. greed isn't too unrealistic
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But not inevitable and charity is a much better use of funds.Not really .. greed isn't too unrealistic
Indeed. And isn't "the greater good" a selfless stance?"Charity is a much better use of funds"
To the selfless maybe. :^)
Indeed. And isn't "the greater good" a selfless stance?
Indeed. And isn't "the greater good" a selfless stance?
Do not hide behind such superficialities as whether you should or should not give a dime to a beggar. That is not the issue. The issue is whether you do or do not have the right to exist without giving him that dime. The issue is whether you must keep buying your life, dime by dime, from any beggar who might choose to approach you. The issue is whether the need of others is the first mortgage on your life and the moral purpose of your existence. The issue is whether man is to be regarded as a sacrificial animal. Any man of self-esteem will answer: No. Altruism says: Yes.
We're not talking about Ann Rand here. We're talking about Christian tenet, according to which we should give away all we have to the poor and follow Jesus. That is the greater good being discussed in this thread.Not according to Ann Rand.
We're not talking about Ann Rand here. We're talking about Christian tenet, according to which we should give away all we have to the poor and follow Jesus. That is the greater good being discussed in this thread.
Yeah, well, Rand is an objectivist, whose ideas seem very self-centered. That is incompatible with Christian tenet (which is, after all, what we're discussing here. The OP and Rand do have a lot in common, which is why I think the OP sucks with regard to its theological position. It's incompatible with Christian tenet.Exactly what Ann Rand saw no benefit in. in fact looking back at the OP, I'd say that position and Ann have a lot in common.
However, how is this tenet for the greater good?
Every sin is forgiable but paganism...
Every sin is forgiable but paganism or worshipping another as God "blashmy the Holy Spirit". Apart from worshipping another as God, any other sin is forgivable and can get out of, and avoid Hell.
Worshipping another as God is treason against the Master of the Multiverse. He will not forgive these on Judgement Day.
:biglaugh:
"Master of the Multiverse!" Coming soon, to theaters everywhere... rated R.
I suspect God is much larger than our limited perspectives imagine. I suspect God has many faces and accepts fealty in many forms.Indeed!
I've read somewhere that He is a jealous God....AND possesses the power of creation!
Might be difficult to deal with if He suspects you prefer another Lord.
Because doing so devalues human life and objectifies individuals.
Using that reasoning it would save tax dollars executing any prisoner.
Nope. That wasn't me.But you just said it makes us no worse than them?
Should we just execute murderers, child molesters, rapists?
Yes. They serve no purpose to society once they've done this.
We need to leave religion out of court room.
:yes:
Unless it's my ex-wife. Then it's probably OK.Or killing someone else because their existence is an inconvenience.
Nope. That wasn't me.
You don't think people should be allowed a chance to redeem themselves?
Existence seems too precious to me for me to judge who is worthy of it. Of course we've a right to protect our own existence. I just can't condone killing someone else in the sense of justice. I don't need that kind of justice.
Or killing someone else because their existence is an inconvenience.