• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If Israel Stopped Occupying The West Bank Would There Be Peace Between The Jews And Arabs?

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
There will be no peace for Israel until a significant percentage of the world's Muslims get very vocal about ending Islamism.

From that perspective, the WB is an essential tactical peace of land for Israel. Imagine your enemies being 5 miles from your major cities, it's untenable.
It isn’t that tactical. Is it?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
defend what? They haven’t been defending anything there have they?
i thought we were discussing what would happen if Israel withdrew from the WB and let Palestinians take over. At that point Israel WOULD have to defend that long, convoluted border.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The PA are also Islamists, and Islamists from all around the region want to end Israel.
Iran has clarified and Khamanei (h) has clarified, what we mean by the end of Israel is end to apartheid where Muslims and Jews live together and people are allowed to return to their country.

It's the west who always twists this to mean killing all Israelis.
 
Last edited:

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Isn’t that isis? The majority of Palestinians don’t want that no?

You have to make a distinction between terrorists and Islamists. There are very few terrorists (although they are quite consequential), but there are hundreds of millions of Islamists. Isis are terrorists.

From a Venn diagram perspective, all terrorists are Islamists, but most Islamists are not terrorists.
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
You have to make a distinction between terrorists and Islamists. There are very few terrorists (although they are quite consequential), but there are hundreds of millions of Islamists. Isis are terrorists.

From a Venn diagram perspective, all terrorists are Islamists, but most Islamists are not terrorists.
Islamist’s don’t want to take over the world. They’re just Arab nations that aren’t secular.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Iran has clarified and Khamanei (h) has clarified, what we mean by the end of Israel is end to apartheid where Muslims and Jews live together and people are allowed to return to their country.

It's the west who always twists this to mean killing all Israelis.
In Israel, Jews and Muslims live together in peace.

With that said, can you clarify what exactly you mean when you say "their country"? Where exactly are the borders of this country you refer to?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Islamist’s don’t want to take over the world. They’re just Arab nations that aren’t secular.
No, you're wrong about that. Islamists are those Muslims who want to spread theocracy (i.e. Sharia), to secular countries. And again, around the world, there are hundreds of millions of Islamists.
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
No, you're wrong about that. Islamists are those Muslims who want to spread theocracy (i.e. Sharia), to secular countries. And again, around the world, there are hundreds of millions of Islamists.
I don’t think that’s the case. Is there a poll?
 

GoodAttention

Well-Known Member
Iran has clarified and Khamanei (h) has clarified, what we mean by the end of Israel is end to apartheid where Muslims and Jews live together and people are allowed to return to their country.

It's the west who always twists this to mean killing all Israelis.

LOL.

If thats the case someone should ask Khamanei if Iran will support a two-state solution to end apartheid.
 
Top