Secret Chief
Degrow!
AI needs input for output.I meant I'd be impressed if it turned out something like that without being prompted to!!!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
AI needs input for output.I meant I'd be impressed if it turned out something like that without being prompted to!!!
Which is why it is inferior to humans and can't do artAI needs input for output.
I meant I'd be impressed if it turned out something like that without being prompted to!!!
So artists don't commission paintings?Yes, but Salix had to tell it to do that it didn't make something similar on its own!
Non-human animals can do art, and I'm told they're inferior to humans as well.Which is why it is inferior to humans and can't do art![]()
Does AI find inspiration in nature and then decides to capture the emotions nature makes them feel in art?So artists don't commission paintings?
AI is inferior to animals as well as to humansNon-human animals can do art, and I'm told they're inferior to humans as well.![]()
I don't know. I'm not AI. That would be a good question for ChatGPT.Does AI find inspiration in nature and then decides to capture the emotions nature makes them feel in art?
ChatGPT is an insentient system of algorithms and is in no way self aware so I wouldn't waste my time asking itI don't know. I'm not AI. That would be a good question for ChatGPT.
Returning to your question ...What you thinking?
Okay.ChatGPT is an insentient system of algorithms and is in no way self aware so I wouldn't waste my time asking it
AI is capable of neither. It’s just a smart machine.
Something capable of malicious intentis incapable of creative expression.![]()
Humans do tooWhich is why it is inferior to humans and can't do art![]()
Both students and teachers use ChatGBT. A teacher showed me a 70 page document he created using ChatGBT.I don't know. I'm not AI. That would be a good question for ChatGPT.
Some of the Greeks felt largely the same about art itself. It's not life, it's an imitation of life. It's artificial and not real. According to Aristotle the proper society has no place for art because it's a souless copy that serves no real purpose.AI is absolutely incapable of producing art
There is no talent, inspiration or creativity involved
All it produces is inhuman, soulless, derivative dross
It mimics art
I would probably call it art, given how poor the definition of art is.And if so, what does that say about art ... or, for that matter, about AI?
Traditionally, classical music composers were commissioned by the great and the good to write works, usually with prompts (as with AI) as to its required nature eg "bombastic, sweeping, uplifting, orchestral." My hubby's going to be crowned king so I want you to create the right vibe...So artists don't commission paintings?
Yes, but real human artists found ways of expressing their own unique views and experiences of the world within those commercial constraints. It's what made their artworks, art. AI has no individual views or experiences to interject into such an endeavor. The best it could do would be to interject the mimicked uniqueness of other humans from the past, and fob them off as "art". Yet by definition it is not art. And it never could be.Traditionally, classical music composers were commissioned by the great and the good to write works, usually with prompts (as with AI) as to its required nature eg "bombastic, sweeping, uplifting, orchestral." My hubby's going to be crowned king so I want you to create the right vibe...
Some people feel that way about the mentally retarded - that they are not really (fully) human, and so are just taking of space and resources that ought to be reserved for the "real" humans.Some of the Greeks felt largely the same about art itself. It's not life, it's an imitation of life. It's artificial and not real. According to Aristotle the proper society has no place for art because it's a souless copy that serves no real purpose.
Yes, but real human artists found ways ...
Yet by definition it is not art.
And it never could be.