• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If you're liberal, I believe your faith is in doubt

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Don't forget he was an evil Socialist too. He supported wealth distribution. See Book of Acts...

I tell ya. That dirty Commie.
Imagine if He stomped into the Capitol building and started flipping over tables and calling out the evil people.

He would be in soon much trouble! They'd probably crucify Him....

Tom
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
The foundation of my belief is doubt, because I fully realize that as a fallible human certainty is a vain luxury.
 

Chris Lovel

searcher
This isn't just christians, but for all religions
So being Liberal prevents you from being Christian, what is the basis of this definitive statement an what evidence do you have?. That is the sort of statement a Rebublican would say. You think you have the franchise on Christianity? I have bad news for you, you don't and to think you do is the height of arrogance. How little you know about it. May I suggest you make an effort to talk to people who are not republicans and exchange views, that is how people get along.
 

james bond

Well-Known Member
what evidence do you have?

Thanks for the chuckle. What evidence do you have? Right away you go for the science excuse.

beyond-wonderland.regular.png
ion.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
What evidence do you have?

What evidence do you yourself have?

Right away you go for the science excuse.

That sounds much like a reasonless appeal to emotion, Bond. I notice you offer no logic nor empirical evidence in defense of your devaluation of the sciences. Perhaps you do not believe the sciences can offer you any insight into the question of whether "liberals are mostly emotionally based people"? If so, I suspect you are right: They cannot, in your case, offer you any insights.



It does not surprise me in the least that you, Bond, would think so.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
When I was 13 I was posting on a Jack the Ripper forum and wondering whether some penile deformity caused him to lash out and murder and mutilate prostitutes. I'd also written a smut novel and acquired a copy of the Communist Manifesto. At 14 I'd devoured 4 books about Stalin. So eh.

I would consider that extraordinary rather than the norm for that age range. :)
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
There is reason in some cases of how this could be true. Modern liberals(who have hi-jacked the classical term "liberal") are mostly emotionally based people. And "faith" does require more than this, like patience and thinking for instance.
For being "mostly emotionally based', their views tend to be significantly more rational and substantiated. Interesting, no?
 

Buddha Dharma

Dharma Practitioner
There is reason in some cases of how this could be true. Modern liberals(who have hi-jacked the classical term "liberal") are mostly emotionally based people.

Ah, the dilemma of the modern Libertarian Republican: am I a liberal or a conservative? I just can't make up my mind...
 
Top