• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I'm against abortion myself, but....

Status
Not open for further replies.

Draka

Wonder Woman
Then I pity you as well. For you cannot see that it's not the childs fault she became pregnant. You ahve whittled down a life into what is best for you and not anyone else. it's selfish.

You obviously have no clue as to the magnitude of situations like these. The women who go through these things and are in highly abusive situations are not, by anyone's definition, selfish.
 

rheff78

I'm your huckleberry.
I'm small minded??? You're the one making blanket statements and trying to pidgeon-hole people under certain little labels as you feel fit to define them and I'M the small-minded one? Did you even read the rest of my post or did you just fling right into the insults? That's the sign of a great debater huh?...no valid argument?...just insult the one who stumped you. :sarcastic

post 338, thank you.
 

rheff78

I'm your huckleberry.
You obviously have no clue as to the magnitude of situations like these. The women who go through these things and are in highly abusive situations are not, by anyone's definition, selfish.

In terms of the baby, yes they are.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
So, what if the mother was alone and on the street, and she had the baby by herself because she had nowhere else to go, and she died in the process, and the baby subsequently died because there was no one to take care of it? Now, not aborting it cost two lives instead of just one. Is that good in your opinion?
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Do you ever lie, rheff? I only ask because most people tend to agree that lying is bad, but that there are exceptions when you can acceptably tell a lie. Do you think there is ever a time you're justified in lying, or is every time just as bad of a sin?
 

McBell

Unbound
Sorry, other things going on. Which points do you want addressed?
See below.

I already said, there was NO CHOICE involved.
yes, it involved me and my wife.
No choice?
Then why the discussion:
As I already said, if the situation came up between me and my wife, WE have talked about it. She was involved in the situation.

What else?
These:
So the mother has absolutely no say in whether she lives or dies?
How is this any different than abortion?

Other than it is the fetus determining the life or death of the mother instead of the mother determining the life or death of the fetus?
What makes the fetus so damn special?

So in your scenario (Mother or fetus) where you choose the fetus, then the Mother has no choice.
How is it that the Mother is not special then?

Seeing as you declared that the not having a choice is what makes the fetus special, if you remove said choice from the mother then by default the mother is the special one, right?

So your declaration is only about you and your wife?
In that case your argument falls through because you yourself said that your wife agrees with your position.
In order to agree SHE HAD TO MAKE A CHOICE.

And then you CHOSE the right way over the wrong way.
So yes there was a choice.

You are being inconsistent.
If you discussed and decided (I.E. made choices) on how to handle it, you made choices.

and you have forgotten to address a few things:
So in your scenario (Mother or fetus) where you choose the fetus, then the Mother has no choice.
How is it that the Mother is not special then?

Seeing as you declared that the not having a choice is what makes the fetus special, if you remove said choice from the mother then by default the mother is the special one, right?

So your declaration is only about you and your wife?​

Are you serious?
Of course there is a choice.
Especially given the subjectivity of the terms "right" and "wrong."


 

doppelganger

Through the Looking Glass
For those of you who have not noticed, arguing with Archie Bunker is fruitless no mater how logical your argument is. Common Sense just rolls off him like water on a ducks back.
Just join the rest of us Meatheads for a beer. :cool:

"I make make you feel, but I can't make you think." - Jethro Tull
 

rheff78

I'm your huckleberry.
So, Pro-Life is protecting life or Anti-Abortion.
Pro-Choice=Pro-Abortion.
NO gray area. Problem solved. Thanks.
 

rheff78

I'm your huckleberry.
For those of you who have not noticed, arguing with Archie Bunker is fruitless no mater how logical your argument is. Common Sense just rolls off him like water on a ducks back.

For the arguments that are so fallacious, it's not that hard.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
So, Pro-Life is protecting life or Anti-Abortion.
Pro-Choice=Pro-Abortion.
NO gray area. Problem solved. Thanks.

So, you're pro-choice, then, right? You have stated that you do not protect life, as you would willingly let your wife die. That leads me to believe that you must be pro-choice, then. No gray area. Thanks for clearing that up.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
So, Pro-Life is protecting life or Anti-Abortion.
Pro-Choice=Pro-Abortion.
NO gray area. Problem solved. Thanks.

Pro-Choice does not equal pro-abortion. Boy, it's like talking to a wall that thinks it's a floor here.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
***MOD ADVISORY***

Thread will remain closed due to persistent off-topic personal remarks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top