Transvestites should not be allowed in the Church, unless they are there to renounce their ways. And, the first sign of rehabilitation would be to remove their cross-dressing attire and make-up.
Again with this? I already mentioned it before, drag queens aren't transgender, neither are they transvestite. A transvestite would be someone who dresses like a woman in normal settings like everyday life and they would be dressed like normal women. It can also be used to describe a sexual fetishism in which a person derives sexual pleasure from playing a member of the opposite gender during sexual intercourse or a fixation with clothing as a erotic tool, but that's another thing completely. Drag queens don't wear those silly dresses, outrageous makeup and wigs in their daily life. They wear them during their performances like any actor. It's the same thing for their outrageous way of speaking with over-emphasis on vowels and sing-singing tones. That's part of the act.
I think I need to say it again but transgender, homosexual, drag queens and transvestite aren't synonymous. They are all quite different from one another. Stop using them as if they were pretty much the same thing. They are not. They aren't even similar.
I don't think that you understand the Church's liturgy very much, trying to equate it with a burlesque show? Words can't express how absurd you sound.
That might be because that's not something I've done. I never equated a burlesque show to Church liturgy or sermons.
What I told you was going on was that an artistic performance by a drag queen occurred in a church and that the subject of the artistic performance was to create a shocking and burlesque effect by contrasting something very profane, a drag queen performance, with something sacred, making a sermon in a Church. The goal of such a performance was to show that the Lutheran Church in question was a very welcoming, almost universalist Church and that the message of love, tolerance and generosity of Christ was for and from everybody, even the people you would least expect it, in that case, a drag queen, a symbol of "immorality". That's that "art part" of the performance. The idea was to mix two radically different, even opposed things, to create something new and of artistic value as it forces us to reconsider what exactly makes the performance of a drag queen so absurd and burlesque in the first place and what gives its sacredness to sermon; what's the essence of both.
Defying conventions, making us question our culture and our mores is basically what art like this is made for and its far from being the only interpretation of such a subject. Rock and Roll prayers were another example. Personally, I don't really enjoy it. I have little appreciation for that type of art as it doesn't touch my personal sensibilities, but I can understand it on an intellectual level. I'm neither a philistine nor a dogmatic bigot.