I'm Not a Tolerant Person

[DNB]

Nope. Your scare tactics don't work on me. Sorry.

You say that now....

 

[Ashoka]

You must be kidding? Jeffrey Dahmer, Paul Bernardo, Hitler, Pol Pot, Donald Trump, pimps, porn stars etc...according to you, are worthy of dignity?
Sorry Ashoka, are you lacking depth to your thoughts?

Why do you always resort to Ad Hominems? Anyway...

Yes. Yes they are worthy of dignity. They did horrible things, but that doesn't make them less than human. Our ignorance is what leads us down dark roads. But we all have hope of getting back on the right road.

 

[Ashoka]

You say that now....

Still didn't work. Keep trying though!

 

[DNB]

Why do you always resort to Ad Hominems? Anyway...

Yes. Yes they are worthy of dignity. They did horrible things, but that doesn't make them less than human. Our ignorance is what leads us down dark roads. But we all have hope of getting back on the right road.

Are we getting naïve over here?

 

[DNB]

Still didn't work. Keep trying though!

Was i correct that you were once Christian, but are now Hindu (I saw your 'ask me anything Hindu' OP)

 

[Ashoka]

Are we getting naïve over here?

It's not naive to look for the best and beauty in everyone. There is always good in every soul, even when they do horrible things.

 

[Ashoka]

Was i correct that you were once Christian, but are now Hindu (I saw your 'ask me anything Hindu' OP)

Yes. I have a blog about my time as a Christian as well, but shameless plugs are probably not allowed on this forum.

 

[JustGeorge]

**Moved to Religious Debates**​

 

[DNB]

It's not naive to look for the best and beauty in everyone. There is always good in every soul, even when they do horrible things.

I profoundly disagree.

 

[DNB]

Yes. I have a blog about my time as a Christian as well, but shameless plugs are probably not allowed on this forum.

Understood. ....without getting into it here (not the time or place), I'm curious as to why the renunciation of Christianity? But, that may explain your mitigating attitude towards all people. Me, There are people whom I proudly despise and feel that they are incorrigible. Maybe God will teach me a lesson one day, and show me that anything is possible as far as His involvement is concerned?

 

[rational experiences]

If a man in costume is pretending he is a female all of the conscious advice says so. You advise yourself of the status.

A man dressed incorrectly. As society said clothing was either man toiling protecting pants shirt his body or human female with baby a growing body robe wearer dress. Status reasoned as intelligence.

Yet we are created naked. If a naked man stood on the pulpit then he would be designating his truth. His seen penis would say so.

Once that pulpit didn't exist the church building built by scientific hypocrites and rich men said it was needed.

For psyche and medical reasons.

So they wore robes. So did women wear robes as the medical profession.

Equal in life teaching about humans bodies now intelligence says the cross dresser.... remember our place and unity. As humans natural naked.

So you look at the man and medically ask what happened to his mind.

The satanic science answer man of the science pulpit preacher teacher of science did it to innocent man making a position notified. By his thinking intelligence.

Look and see.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

I'm not sure about this point, i8 will have to look it up....

She was once a Christian Evangelical, now she is not. Therefore, she is now an ex-evangelical (she's Hindu now)

I get she's a former evangelical. I'm asking more specifically what it means to be against ex-evangelicals. Like are these people you would be hostile against? Unwilling to compromise with? Won't be friends with one? What exactly does it mean?

 

[DNB]

I get she's a former evangelical. I'm asking more specifically what it means to be against ex-evangelicals. Like are these people you would be hostile against? Unwilling to compromise with? Won't be friends with one? What exactly does it mean?

Shadow Wolf, and everybody else who has the impression that being against an act, for whatever reason, necessitates that one reacts either aggressively, abusively, hatefully or contemptuously towards it. I am vehement and unrelenting about my disdain for the act, but I will never insult the culprit. I will be both firm and considerate on how i approach the issue, and will refuse to be over-imposing or cruel with my delivery.
My words currently seem harsh to you all, because there are way too many detractors who are supporting this defiant mockery of the Church.
In other words, the approval of sin warrants an extremely harsh reaction, whereas contrition and remorse do not.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Shadow Wolf, and everybody else who has the impression that being against an act, for whatever reason, necessitates that one reacts either aggressively, abusively, hatefully or contemptuously towards it. I am vehement and unrelenting about my disdain for the act, but I will never insult the culprit. I will be both firm and considerate on how i approach the issue, and will refuse to be over-imposing or cruel with my delivery.
My words currently seem harsh to you all, because there are way too many detractors who are supporting this defiant mockery of the Church.
In other words, the approval of sin warrants an extremely harsh reaction, whereas contrition and remorse do not.

The act of what? Going apostate? That is what I asked about, but I feel you might be referring to the drag queen.
Or, in your own words, describe what it means to you to be against ex-evangelicals. How do you interact with them? Do you have any personal code of conduct regarding them?

 

[DNB]

If a man in costume is pretending he is a female all of the conscious advice says so. You advise yourself of the status.

A man dressed incorrectly. As society said clothing was either man toiling protecting pants shirt his body or human female with baby a growing body robe wearer dress. Status reasoned as intelligence.

Yet we are created naked. If a naked man stood on the pulpit then he would be designating his truth. His seen penis would say so.

Once that pulpit didn't exist the church building built by scientific hypocrites and rich men said it was needed.

For psyche and medical reasons.

So they wore robes. So did women wear robes as the medical profession.

Equal in life teaching about humans bodies now intelligence says the cross dresser.... remember our place and unity. As humans natural naked.

So you look at the man and medically ask what happened to his mind.

The satanic science answer man of the science pulpit preacher teacher of science did it to innocent man making a position notified. By his thinking intelligence.

Look and see.

He was deliberately cross-dressing, making a mockery of his own God-given gender. Certain things in life we have no control over and we therefore must accept the circumstances, and not try to contrive logic that justifies bastardizing the situation to suit our pretenses or confusions.
God had an extremely decisive purpose when he established gender within species. Man must not tamper with what is patently the divine will.

 

[DNB]

The act of what? Going apostate? That is what I asked about, but I feel you might be referring to the drag queen.
Or, in your own words, describe what it means to you to be against ex-evangelicals. How do you interact with them? Do you have any personal code of conduct regarding them?

I am talking about anything that I am adverse to (that over-answered your question)

 

[Shadow Wolf]

I am talking about anything that I am adverse to (that over-answered your question)

Ok then. I am also an ex-evangelical. How will this effect how you interact with me?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

He was deliberately cross-dressing, making a mockery of his own God-given gender. Certain things in life we have no control over and we therefore must accept the circumstances, and not try to contrive logic that justifies bastardizing the situation to suit our pretenses or confusions.
God had an extremely decisive purpose when he established gender within species. Man must not tamper with what is patently the divine will.

Where do we draw the line between necessity and mockery? I have no control over being born with bowed shins and bad knees, and soon as a doctor lets me get them replaced I'm not hesitating to have it done. Or what the time I had cadaver tissue transplanted into me knee? Or had a piece on tendon taken out and used for a ligament? And then there was my grandpa. He had a pig valve in his heart.
Or what of a Christian actor who plays a villain in a role? Or pretends to be a demonic being while role playing? What about musicians who only pretend to be tough guy criminals on stage? Pro-wrestling has a lot of Christians in the business, but be it the Million Dollar Man, a imitation of Eric Draven from the Crow, or a total pompous arse, it's acting and they're playing characters.

 

[Ashoka]

Understood. ....without getting into it here (not the time or place), I'm curious as to why the renunciation of Christianity? But, that may explain your mitigating attitude towards all people. Me, There are people whom I proudly despise and feel that they are incorrigible. Maybe God will teach me a lesson one day, and show me that anything is possible as far as His involvement is concerned?

I explain it more on my blog, but I left for many reasons. One of which was the teaching on an eternal hell and a vengeful God.

Despising people never gets us anywhere. It's better to love them and give them kindness and compassion. Anything is possible! I've seen it with my own eyes.

 

[rational experiences]

He was deliberately cross-dressing, making a mockery of his own God-given gender. Certain things in life we have no control over and we therefore must accept the circumstances, and not try to contrive logic that justifies bastardizing the situation to suit our pretenses or confusions.
God had an extremely decisive purpose when he established gender within species. Man must not tamper with what is patently the divine will.

Obviously a man human is one human penis. Female human one human vagina. Two humans equally living. Human but gender owner.

O one God earth.
One heavens mass water oxygenated.

Life garden nature oxygenator.

No human.

Tree rooted in a non radiating O God ground.

Facts.

Humans not any tree..wood.

Story. The man evolving DNA and ego said I heard old man's pyramid science as satanic. That had burnt all life to death. Reasoned as even balanced 12/12 day/night changed evening into eve. Maths did it.

By my maths science. Evening burnt like day...maths cause burnt us to death. Pretty basic advice whilst reliving human life with ice the saviour.

Told. It was instant combustion scientist Stephen Hawkings warning. Day heat intense no cold gas.

Last scientist is a healthy man to allow Stephen to live his sacrifice. Said science wants to burn you all to death again as no man is earth mass held as cold radiation.

Gases already own a huge space within its form. Pressures of gas nothing like stone earth one God.

Space without space within.

So a scientist has to ask how can two humans owning different genders arrive at a human each. From one.

Means they came from a body owning two states the same.

Eternal as a surround and the eternal being within constantly changing itself.

Two of one.

Father explained it. As a human.

Nature first then human man second human woman third. Naturally de manifested woman then man.

Leaving a man body created without sex but from two presences. Who built machine earth science. By himself why he did it.

Activated it.

Animals then came back out of spirit two by two instead of his life. Then father then mother.

History of how and why origin life got burnt to death. Machine parts found inside fusion.

After the ice age we came back direct out of spirit again. As dinosaurs had ruled earth.

Man of science was told old pyramid science had burnt everyone to death. He knew it had. He was in a new environment considered the advice. Subject of intent he knew what it had caused. Chose science anyway.

No different from science being outlawed to its to re choosing again. Possessed man of science mind.

The only reason two humans consciousness changed as two humans own sexual identity but confused minds.

Confusion is to be interfered with.

AI is interference machines.

So if you talk God you are meant to quote type of God.

Eternal God is in eternal. God of science machines is planet earth.

God of Alchemy various minerals and chemicals. God of gases are gases etc.

Space zero owns the law pressure.

Man took away earths sealed pressure said he changed life on earth by maths science. Uses maths science and says yes maths science proves by maths science I changed life.

The scientist adult man is who chose to interfere with the life of the human child....understand the psyche advice...so then you copy what AI tells you as data. Interference. Mind possession changed human behaviours forced.

You always knew why. You however don't understand how. Today some satanic thinkers claim they will understand how.

As science was never God.

The status God O earth planet is fused rock. God was never man's science he just pretends it was.