• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I'm Voting Libertarian This Year

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I've been weighing all the likely & unlikely outcomes
of the 2 evils, ie, Biden vs Trump. Short term vs long
term risks of various kinds are impossible to evaluate
with any confidence. So whoever the Libertarian
candidate is, they get my vote.

Yes, this could mean failure to prevent Trump's
return to power, with all the governmental, political,
& civil liberties carnage. But Biden is mishandling
the Palestinian genocide, & risking WW3 in his
slavish support of Israel's inhuman brutality & greed.
What will happen to Ukraine? Too hard to discern
how that will play out with either.

So now, at least I'm not voting for evil. And I'll help
send the message that deadly religious bigotry, hatred,
& vengeance will lose votes.
Better to vote for fecklessness...but ethical fecklessness.
 
Last edited:

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
You're simply enabling it.

I can understand his voting decision. It is a difficult and profoundly troubling thought that whichever way one votes, they will be voting for someone who has blood on their hands unless they choose an independent or third-party candidate.

Abstaining from voting for those complicit in warmongering and mass murder seems to me a perfectly understandable position, albeit one with its own downsides.
 

Secret Chief

Very strong language
I've been weighing all the likely & unlikely outcomes
of the 2 evils, ie, Biden vs Trump. Short term vs long
term risks of various kinds are impossible to evaluate
with any confidence. So whoever the Libertarian
candidate is, they get my vote.

Yes, this could mean failure to prevent Trump's
return to power, with all the governmental, political,
& civil liberties carnage. But Biden is mishandling
the Palestinian genocide, & risking WW3 in his
slavish support of Israel's inhuman brutality & greed.
What will happen to Ukraine? Too hard to discern
how that will play out with either.

So now, at least I'm not voting for evil. And I'll help
send the message that deadly religious bigotry, hatred,
& vengeance will lose votes.
Better to vote for fecklessness...but ethical fecklessness.
Libertarian going to vote libertarian. I'm shocked.
I'll be voting Labour in the UK General Election. Crazy or what?
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
I believe that I can as well. Still, I believe that enabling a xenophobic, homophobic, and misogynistic, narcissist who looks up to the likes of Erdogan, Kim Jong-Un, Putin, Viktor Orban, and Xi Jinping, is a very dangerous and irresponsible game.

I see that as a valid position as well. It seems to me that there are no easy or definitive answers in this case, hence my lack of inclination to condemn either view.
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
What I can never quite get.... we see to candidates, and only 2 candidates...and we don't like either of them.... but decide to vote for one we feel will dothe least damage, or who is the lesser of two evils..... whne there are other options.... if enough Americans get fed up and start voting for who they think will do a better job and not buy into the "throwing away their vote" propaganda.... things just might change..... hopefully for the better...... or at least give the bone heads in DC a wake up call..... and that is the most you will see me type in a political post...... The bear is out
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I've been weighing all the likely & unlikely outcomes
of the 2 evils, ie, Biden vs Trump. Short term vs long
term risks of various kinds are impossible to evaluate
with any confidence. So whoever the Libertarian
candidate is, they get my vote.

Yes, this could mean failure to prevent Trump's
return to power, with all the governmental, political,
& civil liberties carnage. But Biden is mishandling
the Palestinian genocide, & risking WW3 in his
slavish support of Israel's inhuman brutality & greed.
What will happen to Ukraine? Too hard to discern
how that will play out with either.

So now, at least I'm not voting for evil. And I'll help
send the message that deadly religious bigotry, hatred,
& vengeance will lose votes.
Better to vote for fecklessness...but ethical fecklessness.
At the end of the day, you have to vote your own conscience. If you've thought it through, and it looks like you have, I would not dare gain-say you.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
What I can never quite get.... we see to candidates, and only 2 candidates...and we don't like either of them.... but decide to vote for one we feel will dothe least damage, or who is the lesser of two evils..... whne there are other options.... if enough Americans get fed up and start voting for who they think will do a better job and not buy into the "throwing away their vote" propaganda.... things just might change..... hopefully for the better...... or at least give the bone heads in DC a wake up call..... and that is the most you will see me type in a political post...... The bear is out
I honestly don't think the "other options" choice works very well in what is very much a two-party system. It does work well in multi-party Winchester-style parliaments, like Canada's, where ruling parties can be reduced to minority governments that have to negotiate with other parties to get anything at all done.
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
I honestly don't think the "other options" choice works very well in what is very much a two-party system. It does work well in multi-party Winchester-style parliaments, like Canada's, where ruling parties can be reduced to minority governments that have to negotiate with other parties to get anything at all done.
Could get a 3rd party going though.... not necessarily at the presidential level to begin with... but Congress and Senate
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
if enough Americans get fed up and start voting for who they think will do a better job and not buy into the "throwing away their vote" propaganda.... things just might change

Or you might end up facilitating the overturn of Roe v Wade,
waging war on the LGBTQ community,​
becoming the unthinking ally of those who champion book bans,​
emboldening the proud boys and their allies,​
and opening the floodgates of misinformation.​
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Or you might end up facilitating the overturn of Roe v Wade,
waging war on the LGBTQ community,​
becoming the unthinking ally of those who champion book bans,​
emboldening the proud boys and their allies,​
and opening the floodgates of misinformation.​
Or you might not
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I honestly don't think the "other options" choice works very well in what is very much a two-party system. It does work well in multi-party Winchester-style parliaments, like Canada's, where ruling parties can be reduced to minority governments that have to negotiate with other parties to get anything at all done.
Trouble is, Trump is not aiming to get anything done. He is all about promissing to be an authoritarian dad while behaving like a deranged brat.

You can not argue with delusion. Nor, apparently, with its support base.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm reasonably certain that the LGBTQ+ community is facing a greater threat today. So, too, immigrants, and women's reproductive rights.


It is certainly possible that you vote could be benign.
I hope to send the message that civil liberties,
peaceful foreign policy, lower taxes, & having
the rule of law apply even to government
workers will prevail.
If you vote for Biden, you're voting in opposition
to those things. I understand that you're balancing
negatives against positives too. We each weigh
them, & decide for ourselves. But you do not
have the moral high ground. I don't claim it either.
 
Top