Thief
Rogue Theologian
when your chemistry fails......you will tooWhat is written in fiction may not apply to reality.
it is what you believe
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
when your chemistry fails......you will tooWhat is written in fiction may not apply to reality.
when your chemistry fails......you will too
it is what you believe
I will do an op for that.....look for itNo, it is reality. Belief is irrelevant.
Sorry, but I don't care for any kingdom.and it is written....
the kingdom of heaven is within you
but apparently.....within you
the kingdom will fall
Characterizing scripture as fiction is childish name-calling at best. This is particularly true of Hebrew 'Scripture.' It's really hard to believe that you don't know better so why do it?What is written in fiction may not apply to reality.
so too.....the servantsSorry, but I don't care for any kingdom.
Monarch can too easily become autocratic tyrant.
Characterizing scripture as fiction is childish name-calling at best. This is particularly true of Hebrew 'Scripture.' It's really hard to believe that you don't know better so why do it?
the story.....is the important partScripture has historical and fictional aspects. The description of deities and spirits is fictional. The description of towns and buildings *may* be historical.
Not a problem.Sorry, Jayhawker. I did click "like" for your own response.
About Septuagint bible vs others editions (Masoretic Text, Dead Sea Scrolls, Samaritan Torah, Targum, Vulgate)?
Or about the biblical timeline vs history/archaeology?
I would be happy to engage in a serious discussion of this subject, IF, we both agree to answer all questions that we may be asked, does that interest you?
So you say, but 'fictional' implies a conscious fabrication and your choice of the term is, in my opinion, agenda-driven and petty.Scripture has historical and fictional aspects.
I am asking which thread you are intending to start.I take that as a, "no interest' in the offer.
It's clear to me you have a lack of faith. Without faith it is impossible to please God.
Characterizing scripture as fiction is childish name-calling at best. This is particularly true of Hebrew 'Scripture.' It's really hard to believe that you don't know better so why do it?
Save for the implied ad hominem, it is not. So, for example, I would apply neither term to the Tanakh.How is calling scripture fiction less acceptable behavior than calling it fact?
So you say, but 'fictional' implies a conscious fabrication and your choice of the term is, in my opinion, agenda-driven and petty.
the story.....is the important part
how it affects your next thought and feeling makes all the difference
but then again....the defensive habit of dismissal could close your mind
and nothing will happen to 'you'
And if it is spiritual and not material, it is not "life" -- and that is by definition.if I could show you.....it would be material
not spiritual
duh
You are correct in part -- I don't believe them. For the most part, in fact those accounts do not even claim to have been written by anyone who ate with Him. Mark, for example, surely ate with Peter, but there's nothing whatever to say he ate with Christ. Same with Luke the Evangelist.Matthew, according to most scholars, was not written by an eye-witness (Matthew the tax-collector). And the majority of scholars do not think John was written by John the Apostle, son of Zebedee.We have the accounts of those who ate with Him. But you don't believe them. That's your problem, no one else's.
That is not my implication. Myths and legends, even if believed, are still fictional.Save for the implied ad hominem, it is not. So, for example, I would apply neither term to the Tanakh.