• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

In the beginning...

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Characterizing scripture as fiction is childish name-calling at best. This is particularly true of Hebrew 'Scripture.' It's really hard to believe that you don't know better so why do it?

Scripture has historical and fictional aspects. The description of deities and spirits is fictional. The description of towns and buildings *may* be historical.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Scripture has historical and fictional aspects. The description of deities and spirits is fictional. The description of towns and buildings *may* be historical.
the story.....is the important part

how it affects your next thought and feeling makes all the difference

but then again....the defensive habit of dismissal could close your mind
and nothing will happen to 'you'
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Sorry, Jayhawker. I did click "like" for your own response. :shrug:
Not a problem. :D

Parenthetically, it is widely recognized that numbers such as 7, 20, and 40, and their multiples as largely symbolic. So, for example:

"Some (compare Wellhausen, "Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels", 2d ed., 1883, i. 285) are inclined to see in the 480 years which are stated (I Kings vi. 1) to have passed between the Exodus and the building of the Temple of Solomon a multiplication of forty by twelve, or the round number of twelve generations." - source
 

Ted Evans

Active Member
Premium Member
About Septuagint bible vs others editions (Masoretic Text, Dead Sea Scrolls, Samaritan Torah, Targum, Vulgate)?

Or about the biblical timeline vs history/archaeology?

I would be happy to engage in a serious discussion of this subject, IF, we both agree to answer all questions that we may be asked, does that interest you?

I take that as a, "no interest' in the offer.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Characterizing scripture as fiction is childish name-calling at best. This is particularly true of Hebrew 'Scripture.' It's really hard to believe that you don't know better so why do it?

How is calling scripture fiction less acceptable behavior than calling it fact?

I consider most of scripture fiction as well. Are you saying that I should know better than to post that?
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
if I could show you.....it would be material
not spiritual

duh
And if it is spiritual and not material, it is not "life" -- and that is by definition.

And though I don't usually say things like "duh," I think in this case I'm entitled to say, "right back at ya!"
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
We have the accounts of those who ate with Him. But you don't believe them. That's your problem, no one else's.
You are correct in part -- I don't believe them. For the most part, in fact those accounts do not even claim to have been written by anyone who ate with Him. Mark, for example, surely ate with Peter, but there's nothing whatever to say he ate with Christ. Same with Luke the Evangelist.Matthew, according to most scholars, was not written by an eye-witness (Matthew the tax-collector). And the majority of scholars do not think John was written by John the Apostle, son of Zebedee.

You are incorrect in the other part -- it is not my problem. My not believing something that you happen to believe presents no problem whatever to me. Probably in much the same way that your lack of belief in the Hindu pantheon is not a problem for you.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Save for the implied ad hominem, it is not. So, for example, I would apply neither term to the Tanakh.
That is not my implication. Myths and legends, even if believed, are still fictional.

Vocabulary.com/dictionary/fiction ...

fiction

A fiction is a deliberately fabricated account of something. It can also be a literary work based on imagination rather than on fact, like a novel or short story.

The Latin word fictus means “to form,” which seems like a good source for the English word fiction, since fiction is formed in the imagination. Like its literary cousins fable, legend, and myth, however, fiction has a slightly darker additional meaning: a deliberate lie or untruth. When we talk about "the line between fact and fiction," we're talking about the difference between truth and lies.​
 
Top