• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Indoctrination.... Wrong or right?

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
That Helen Keller was a socialist doesn't mean much, so I can see it being omitted.

But, then again, if you're presenting her story as one of inspiration, and simultaneously want to instill a sense of nationalism in your students, you leave out the part about her being socialist so the kids don't develop a liking for that system.

The hardest job of a historian is to select what to omit, since there is a virtual infinity of information available. Those who have some axe to grind, of course, want the stuff that supports their view to be included, and tend to paranoid reactions if it isn't.

I dare say all school systems have an understandable tendency to glorify their country, and I am not sure, so long as honesty is maintained, that this is such a bad thing. We should be proud of our native country -- it is a natural instinct and, so long as it doesn't become jingoism, I think it is healthy as it serves to motivate work to improve ones homeland.

Well, that's not the sense I got in school. I don't mind others being proud of their countries, nor do I necessarily mind that being taught (though I'm not much of a patriot, myself), but our faults should be addressed, at the same time, and they're often not. America is presented as basically some kind of torch-bearing messiah. Sure, that might have been the case 200 years ago, but it's not anymore.

Socialism is state ownership of business activity; Communism is common ownership of business activity. Since the transition to common ownership would logically require a period of state ownership, the two are easily confused.

Gotcha.
 

linwood

Well-Known Member
I hate to say it, but I would agree that this child is being indoctrinated. He may not grow up afraid to give up his beliefs at some point, but he probably will come to rely on other people to tell him what he's supposed to think (on not just religious issues but political and social issues as well) for a long as he lives.

I would call what you`re describing indoctrination as well.

It doesn`t bother me much if someone chooses to believe what I see as false.

What bothers me is what you describe above, teaching by indoctrination (in even one area if the area is important enough) has a very good chance of leading a child into an adulthood where they are unaware how to question other important things.
They would tend to rely on authority as their source of "truth" in many if not all things.

That is where the danger lies and where parents who indoctrinate do a disservice to their child.
 
Top