strikeviperMKII
Well-Known Member
There is no evidence meaning it never happened.
Okay...but that's not really the point, is it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There is no evidence meaning it never happened.
This part of your argument is illogical itself. You're committing a logical fallacy: argument from ignorance."If there is no evidence, it is illogical"
it means
"if there is NO proof that it is real/has happened, then is hasn't happened"
You've probably thought of this before, known of this before but haven't really much payed attention to it but i believe this is the best statement to bring up when you are arguing against christianity
If it is backed by evidence, it is logical.
If it is not backed up by evidence, it is illogical.
The bible is not backed up by evidence so therefore it illogical.
Christians believe in the bible, thus they believe that if it is not backed up by evidence, it is logical.
Christians are illogical.
When i mean evidence, i mean a group of evidence that consists of actual archeological proof and other considerably firm evidence. NOT just evidence which is few and extremely subtle when supporting something in the bible.
I believe this is the best.
You can constantly argue on small details in the bible and support it with verses on topics that prove the christian lord hates homosexuals or he is evil and invented sin, but yet it all comes back to this.
Yea, what you just said supports that fact
What you just said is giving me a really bad headache, you're constantly saying what i am saying is a logical fallacy when you don't even support WHY.
Allow me to clarify the obvious.
when i meant
"if there is evidence, it is logical"
It means
"If there is proof that it is real/has happened, then it is real/has happened"
"If there is no evidence, it is illogical"
it means
"if there is NO proof that it is real/has happened, then is hasn't happened"
If you are going to argue with me saying
"oh,maybe i said blah blah to my friend. we have no proof it ever has happened, so with your illogical statements, you would conclude that it never happened when it actually did"
My arguement:
Witnesses and yourself and your friend count as proof. The only way you could support that it happened is if you said it and i believed it and then you would go on saying the bible is like that
BUT NO.
the bible is different. the bible is incredibly firm this giving it room for a lot of people to point out its flaws or anything questionable.
Why is there no hard physical evidence of the 40 years moses and his people have been on the desert?
What about proof of jesus?
historical evidence that certain stories in the bible actually happened?
There is no "instant win". When people have deeply held beliefs, no matter how irrational they are, one cannot dissuade them by finding a logical fly in the ointment.You've probably thought of this before, known of this before but haven't really much payed attention to it but i believe this is the best statement to bring up when you are arguing against christianity....