• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Interspecies Marriage

Timothy Bryce

Timothy Bryce

Active Member
dave_ said:
Now we've gotten over homosexual marriage now its time we discuss interspecies marriage.i say we being to act like responsible people and accept the reality of zoophilia.For example if a man living a lonely life falls in love with his favourite animal or a women having impressed with the greatness of her horses penis and falls in love who are we to judge them.And isn't god all about love.So i want to see interspecies marriages taking place at the churches right now.What do you think?Hasn't the time come we drop our prejudices about zoophilia?
Click to expand...

No.

The problem - which will never be resolved for pro-zoophilics - is that there is no way to prove that an animal partaking in sex with a human is not a form of rape.

Any animal that's penetrated or coerced into a sexual act with a human would probably be deemed to have been raped purely on the basis of the animal's capacity.

In that case, pro-zoophilics would need to repeal every sexual assault clause that's ever existed to serve their cause.

Open and shut.
 
Curious George

Curious George

Veteran Member
1robin said:
You certainly did and this has nothing to do with my faith.

1. The bible does not say anything about not allowing a women to marry the berlin wall. Maybe even God could not predict something that stupid.
2. The site I learned about all these people marrying all these bizarre entities and objects has no theological point of view. It simply reported a list of people who married pathetically stupid objects.

Quit looking for conspiracy's, plots, and secret plans, and simply let the facts speak for themselves.

When you unhook morality from any objective transcendent standard then everything is equally wrong or equally right. You no longer have an objective source to count on to tell you whether anything is right or wrong. You have to turn your self or a group of ourselves into God and pretend their (usually self interested and faulty) ethical declarations now govern. By dismissing God you dismiss any hope than anything what so ever is actually morally true. And I gave you a couple of examples of how societies or people who use their own moral standards as truth wind up doing stupid things. If you really want to see what happens in these situations look at Stalin's USSR. They picked him specifically because he hated religion in general and he did his best to annihilate it from his huge empire and at least 20 million died in the process. Atheistic utopias have been some of the most lethal, totalitarian, and oppressive experiments in history.

Let me ask you a question. Without appealing to anything that transcends us. Prove that the holocaust was wrong and feeding the poor in Africa good? That is in your world view there exist any moral truths or duties at all.
Click to expand...

This proof has already been done by many. There is more than just two theories of morality. But, you do bring up a good point. God was invented in part to give authority to people's subjective morality or laws. Otherwise people would have no reason to respect the law save whatever power the current earthly authority had over them.

But your demands of proof work both ways. In order to assert you religious morality, prove your god exists, or is even internally consistent.
 
Skwim

Skwim

Veteran Member
The Good Doctor said:
The problem - which will never be resolved for pro-zoophilics - is that there is no way to prove that an animal partaking in sex with a human is not a form of rape.
Click to expand...
Videos could easily resolve the issue. If an animal is seen to have willing sex with a human that should be proof enough (and there are such videos).
 
Timothy Bryce

Timothy Bryce

Active Member
Skwim said:
Videos could easily resolve the issue. If an animal is seen to have willing sex with a human that should be proof enough (and there are such videos).
Click to expand...

It still meets the element of coercing something that doesn't have the capacity to understand what it is doing by a human who does.
 
dust1n

dust1n

Zindīq
What would be the purpose of the marriage? An animal can't own property, or get custody of kids, or take you to court, or leave an inheritance, or visit one in the hospital, etc.
 
McBell

McBell

Unbound
dust1n said:
What would be the purpose of the marriage? An animal can't own property, or get custody of kids, or take you to court, or leave an inheritance, or visit one in the hospital, etc.
Click to expand...
or enter into a legal contract...
Which is what marriage is in the USA
 
Skwim

Skwim

Veteran Member
The Good Doctor said:
It still meets the element of coercing something that doesn't have the capacity to understand what it is doing by a human who does.
Click to expand...
How is allowing an animal do what it wants to do amount to coercing? And why would you assume an animal doesn't have the capacity to understand what it's doing? I've seen plenty of animals do a lot of stuff, and they all appeared to understand what they're doing. Ever see a trained dog act?

BTW, the subject of zoophilia (bestiality) was discussed last February through June HERE
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top