• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Iran Nuclear Agreement

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
In view of an ever increasing hostile world does it not seems reasonable for the US to increase our spending in defensive programs like say a effective ABM program,

Nope, it does not. Not by a long shot.

devote more technology to defend against cyber attacks, and while we are at it stop downsizing the military and insure that military readiness is maintained.

Are you kidding?
 

esmith

Veteran Member
esmith said:
In view of an ever increasing hostile world does it not seems reasonable for the US to increase our spending in defensive programs like say a effective ABM program,devote more technology to defend against cyber attacks, and while we are at it stop downsizing the military and insure that military readiness is maintained.
Nope, it does not. Not by a long shot.


esmith said:
devote more technology to defend against cyber attacks, and while we are at it stop downsizing the military and insure that military readiness is maintained.

Are you kidding?
No, I'm deadly serious. I'm in the "speak softly and carry a damn big stick" camp.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Sure.

The USA could get rid of it's own arsenal, and impose the same sanctions on every other country with a nuclear program it does on Iran. Such as France, China, Great Britain, and Israel. We refuse to do business with them until an international agency demonstrates that they are nuclear weapons free.

Tom

The usa
How's that working out with North Korea?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
No, I'm deadly serious. I'm in the "speak softly and carry a damn big stick" camp.
That I see, but surely there is such a thing as realizing that there is no chance of attaining one's goals with a certain direction.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Any competent military and government will have plans regarding nations which it sees as it's enemy.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I would think the IDF has a fulltime team that does nothing but keep revamping plans to engage Iran under an assortment of scenarios, including offensive plans.
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Any competent military and government will have plans regarding nations which it sees as it's enemy.
Of course.
But every ill spoken word from Iran is flaunted as a reason to attack.
Yet US & Israelistan make very real plans to attack Iran.....& they wonder why Iran is so hostile.
They aren't aware of their own hypocrisy & malevolence.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
How about Iran stops sponsoring Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Hamas...... and then tries the whole "we are a peaceful country" approach again?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
How about Iran stops sponsoring Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Hamas...... and then tries the whole "we are a peaceful country" approach again?
That is one side of the coin.
But I notice that fans of US & Israeli alliance aggression towards Iran don't acknowledge the effects of what they do.
You complain about 85 deaths, yet don't address a million Iranian deaths at the hands of Iraq (supplied with US WMDs, training & economic assistance).
It pays dividends to understand the perspective of one's enemies.
This yields options, including one to ramp the aggression down instead of up.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
Well perhaps I simply see the difference between a war of two countries and a bomb attack in Argentina which targeted only civilians of a specific denomination.

The perspective? Well apparently Jews are fair game wherever they live and whatever their political ideas may be.
But I am not expecting you to understand that.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well perhaps I simply see the difference between a war of two countries and a bomb attack in Argentina which targeted only civilians of a specific denomination.

The perspective? Well apparently Jews are fair game wherever they live and whatever their political ideas may be.
But I am not expecting you to understand that.
So you claim superior understanding, eh?
Perhaps instead, your singular victimhood perspective limits yours.
We're all "fair victims" to someone.
But this doesn't justify a preemptive attack upon a country by those who have been more abusive, provocative, deadly & threatening all along.
Israel needs us to back up its belligerence, & I'm pleased as punch that Obama didn't play along.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
If you can't differentiate between state sponsored terror and war between two countries... well.

In case you haven't noticed, no one has attacked Iran yet.
Meanwhile for the last 39 years Iran sponsored and engineered terror against some people throughout the world.

Yeah yeah my victimhood. Thing is I regularly visit a certain place of worship with a Community Centre. If people in Argentina who are 13.776 km away from Teheran can get hit by a terrorist attack in their Community Centre, how can I say "well that was just in Argentina" while I am just 3.898 km away from Teheran?

But I get it, its just my victimhood. Its not like quite recently a Bus loaded with people of a certain denomination "magically" exploded in Burgas. And somehow everything points towards a certain country in the Middle East. I mean its probably just a coincidence. No worries. After all your aren't targeted.

Its just my victimhood. I bet the police armed with their submachine guns in front of our Community Centre are also just there because of our victimhood.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
If you can't differentiate between state sponsored terror and war between two countries... well.
Tis not my ability to differentiate which is the root problem here.
It's more that your paranoia is leading to misguided war lust at the expense
of others, & a complete failure to respect the history & lives of Iranians.
In case you haven't noticed, no one has attacked Iran yet.
Not recently & overtly.
But Iran has suffered more at the hands of Americastan than Israel has by all of its
enemies combined during the same period. To understand the great loss of life
they've suffered would go a long way to designing a less combative foreign policy
to make them less of a threat.
Meanwhile for the last 39 years Iran sponsored and engineered terror against some people throughout the world.
In case you haven't noticed, so have US & Israel.
(Do you like how I co-opted your modus operandi there?)
Yeah yeah my victimhood. Thing is I regularly visit a certain place of worship with a Community Centre. If people in Argentina who are 13.776 km away from Teheran can get hit by a terrorist attack in their Community Centre, how can I say "well that was just in Argentina" while I am just 3.898 km away from Teheran?
But I get it, its just my victimhood. Its not like quite recently a Bus loaded with people of a certain denomination "magically" exploded in Burgas. And somehow everything points towards a certain country in the Middle East. I mean its probably just a coincidence. No worries. After all your aren't targeted.
Its just my victimhood. I bet the police armed with their submachine guns in front of our Community Centre are also just there because of our victimhood.
And still, you don't acknowledge that a million Iranians died in an unprovoked attack upon them by Iraq, with extensive US support, including WMDs. To understand this is to grok why Iran would pursue nuclear weaponry. The problem is that they need WMDs. Tis this need which should be eliminated, rather than Iran's capability.

So many ferriners & domestic fundies, particularly the paranoid militaristic Zionists, are so cavalier about embroiling us in yet another war with massive loss of life over decades. They eschew peace in favor of crushing enemies. This is neither successful in the short run, nor a sustainable model in the long run.
 
Last edited:
Top