Irony of the evolutionary belief

[Pogo]

OK, I wasn't aware that you have set yourself up as the highest and final authority and the only abettor of truth. I thought you were a mortal like the rest of us, excuse me please

You have said nothing that was not an assertion, you claim to know all about evolution and that it is wrong, but never tell us how or why.

 

[YoursTrue]

Yeah.
Well,
Sometimes low hanging fruit is to hard to resist.

I mean, we are only human.

Ah guess...

 

[YoursTrue]

Are you going to defend any of your claims and actually provide evidence or are we entering into the personal attack phase of the chess match?

He almost moved me to your side--

 

[Pogo]

My father created science, so beat that!!!

Should I take that as a yes?

 

[Pogo]

OK. And you reject it all.

Well his father did listen to Rock and Roll.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Thank goodness!
I thought perhaps it was just me who could not make heads or tails of it.

I know that there are some sincere believers that are truly ignorant of the facts and science of biology or have gotten a confusing mix of misinformation from dismal sources that are just trying to manipulate them for selfish reasons. But the problem is that most I encounter seem to feel they are fully knowledgeable--at an expert level--and have no need to listen or learn or know enough to know they have been hoodwinked by sources like AiG or Creation.com.

I would rather enjoy the opportunity to help them learn something, but it always ends up leading to personal attacks and passive aggression that leaves them giving exactly what they claim they are getting.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Well his father did listen to Rock and Roll.

Does he feel like we do?

 

[YoursTrue]

Maybe not, but you version of common sense seems a little earthy, like dirt, it is everywhere and basically worthless.

Dirt is necessary for life. Not worthless at all.

 

[YoursTrue]

@Pogo = on the other hand, dirt can shift and from what I have learned, leach into bones.

 

[YoursTrue]

Does he feel like we do?

Which father are you talking about? The one that says he created the heavens and earth in the beginning?

 

[YoursTrue]

G'night folks, it's been an interesting trip. Y'all have a good evening. Well, it's after midnight here so I guess it's a new day. Not dawn yet though.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Maybe not, but you version of common sense seems a little earthy, like dirt, it is everywhere and basically worthless.

Some might say that dirt is necessary for life. But given that life probably first arose in an aqueous environment, that wouldn't seem likely.

However, it might be said that life is necessary for dirt.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

How would the mother survive without all her vital organs all there at the same time? Then on top of all that the first mother's body has to be able to have a child, so not only does the mother need all the vital organs the mother needs to be capable of having a child develop inside her body. Oh and that's really possible? So all this stuff happened all by itself huh over billions of years that's a laugh.

I'm sorry, you are all over the place. Not only does this not reply to what you quoted, you've literally combined a whole bunch of unrelated issues. I'm going to just move on, as I really don't know what to say when a post is this scrambled.

 

[walt]

I'm sorry, you are all over the place. Not only does this not reply to what you quoted, you've literally combined a whole bunch of unrelated issues. I'm going to just move on, as I really don't know what to say when a post is this scrambled.

sorry

 

[IndigoChild5559]

I agree with that, but your only problem is that I do know everything about the TOE

Nope. But I am certified to teach the basics. You know, those basics that creationists aren't aware of.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

(in the context of the FT argument)….

1 you asked for a testable prediction for design

2 my prediction “life permitting values would be narrow”

How does that prediction follow? What is special about design that in a design model, the "life permitting values" would have to be narrow?
Why MUST they be narrow in a design model? Why can't they be wide a design model? Why can't they be narrow in a non-design model?

Your so-called prediction doesn't seem to follow logically from your supposed "model" at all.
Also, quotes around "model", because as a model, that is laughably vague and abstract.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

That is actually false……… you need evidence (or good reasons) to dismiss something.

And claims having no evidence, is a good reason.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

the how is irrelevant. you dont need to know HOW the pyramids where made in order to conclude design

The rocks were demonstrably carved and stacked. That makes it a building.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

This is like the foutrth post where you evade the question………. I won’t even try to ask again

You mean, the fourth post where the answer is given after which you ignore it and then claim it was "evaded".

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

We don't expect to find any such thing as we have already concluded that evolution is the biggest lie of the past millennium. If it was true, then we would have found millions of transitional fossils, which would be the evidence to support the theory. But the theory is dead in the water as there has never been a single shred of evidence to support it.

First you should learn what a transitional actually is.

With that false idea in your head of what it is, you will not be able to properly recognize it.

Doubling down on these strawmen isn't going to help you or your case.