SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Those ladies make me ill.Moms for Liberty are trying to save the children, aren't you on board?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Those ladies make me ill.Moms for Liberty are trying to save the children, aren't you on board?
Yes, it does. I don't think they're pointless. Don't you enjoy thinking more deeply about things and having discussions about them?These arguments are pointless, so does it really matter?
sorry I don't agree, thanks anyway.Yes, it does. I don't think they're pointless. Don't you enjoy thinking more deeply about things and having discussions about them?
Or maybe you're happy living in a bubble where you never learn anything knew or consider other points of view?
Fair enough.sorry I don't agree, thanks anyway.
It boggles my mind that people would prefer living in a bubble rather than expanding their minds with new knowledge and experiences.sorry I don't agree, thanks anyway.
I do .. but when people continue to talk past each other, it becomes pointless.Don't you enjoy thinking more deeply about things and having discussions about them?
You keep repeating that to you, the science is only speculation. Why do you think that that is relevant to others who know what you haven't learned? The theory is correct beyond reasonable doubt, meaning that if you hold any palpable doubt that you either don't know the theory or your doubt is not based in reason.Even IF things evolved in the Darwinian style (of which there is no proof, and by that I mean no real evidence, only suggestive propositions and more theoretical suppositions), you and yours have successfully quashed any attempts at reason.
Do you think that the theory proposes that human organs evolved sequentially?Can say the heart, lungs or brain survive by themselves, waiting for the other vital organs to evolve?
You must mean a human mother. The first mothers weren't human. They weren't even mammals, and their offspring did not develop in their bodies. If we take the phrase daughter cells literally, the first mothers were single cells.the first mother's body has to be able to have a child, so not only does the mother need all the vital organs the mother needs to be capable of having a child develop inside her body.
It had to. There was nobody there when the first life formed and began evolving.So all this stuff happened all by itself huh over billions ... you expect it's reasonable for animals and humans to come about, all by themselves. Millions of steps?
Alveoli aren't workhorses. They don't have moving parts. The work is done by the diaphragm, which delivers breath to and from the alveoli, where gases diffuse into and out of the capillaries:Although they're microscopic, alveoli are the workhorses of your respiratory system.
Evolution has likely occurred everywhere that it is possible, that is, everywhere that life exists. That's how nature works. Whenever the conditions are right for rain, it rains. Whenever conditions are right for something to burn, it burns. Life will form wherever the conditions for abiogenesis obtain, and will then begin evolving for as long as parents produce offspring that differ from themselves.explain please if evolution is really a thing, then why hasn't never happened on the other planets?
Not if you don't have compelling, evidenced arguments.Is there anything I could say to convince you otherwise? No! What's the point?
It is the new American leadership by example.Fair enough.
However, that does not mean you are allowed to violate the rules with your likes.
It's not so strange ... except our religious history tells a different tale.If, according to evolutionists, human intelligence eventually emerged in an environment that was previously lifeless for millions and millions of years... what is so strange that a Superior Intelligence has already existed for another INFINITE number of years BEFORE that period of time?
Situation? Confuse the situation?What about it? Are you demonstrating lack of knowledge or trying to confuse the situation further?
I am not saying that.You keep repeating that to you, the science is only speculation.
And they will remain pointless until people like yourself actually get a decent education as to the topics you comment over so as not to come across as purely trolling. Not meant in any offensive way of course but simply the truth. Not that it matters to you perhaps.These arguments are pointless, so does it really matter?
you are correct, I am learning, I can count to three so far, sorry I can't talk right now I'm involved in a party with the my relatives, gorillaz, monkeys lizards and turtles.And they will remain pointless until people like yourself actually get a decent education as to the topics you comment over so as not to come across as purely trolling. Not meant in any offensive way of course but simply the truth. Not that it matters to you perhaps.
Then what are you saying? You spend endless time pointing out word choices that have zero effect on the subject at hand.I am not saying that.
Long way to go then. Good luck.you are correct, I am learning, I can count to three so far.
Yes but the point that I made is that we don’t need to know HOW something was made in order to conclude design…… so ether agree or refute this point……………………….. ohhh let me guess you already refuted that , but you won’t quote the supposed refutation.The rocks were demonstrably carved and stacked. That makes it a building.
We do not need to see it to understand it. The concepts that explain how that happens can be tested. I know how and why water gets up into clouds and what holds that mass up there. You probably do not. No God need apply.Can we see evaporation happening? Can we see all the steps that happen in a cloud, like how the evaporation collects in the cloud, how it forms water, can we see how a cloud is capable of carrying over 1 million pounds of water?