Comprehend
Res Ipsa Loquitur
well, those two things are almost the same thing. The best indicator in 2004 of which political party you belonged to was whether or not you went to church weekly or not...
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is Abortion really an issue for Gay's and Lesbians?
- Thread starter Reverend Rick
- Start date
well, those two things are almost the same thing. The best indicator in 2004 of which political party you belonged to was whether or not you went to church weekly or not...
M
Majikthise
Guest
Rich daddy has to go along with popular opinion in his community or risk becoming an outcast, and churches are a central theme in affluent communities.
bflydad
Member
standing_alone
Well-Known Member
Comprehend said:
I'm not insulted at all. I just think it rather unfortunate that a difficult issue is turned into just another way to ridicule or make jokes about those who have a different political ideology. Because of its controversy and its nature, the choice to get an abortion is a difficult one, and that some seem to almost trivialize it (and this happens on both sides) in order to get one up on the "other side" is rather unfortunate, when such effort would be better spent on addressing other social conditions that lead to women having to make such a choice.
standing_alone
Well-Known Member
Comprehend said:
The reason most abortions take place in big cities is because it is in the big cities that most clinics that provide abortions are located.
Ãanisty
Well-Known Member
True, if you live in a small town, you probably traveled to a big city to get the procedure done.
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
Two good points.
If these unwanted children would have grown up and got jobs, the social security system would be in better shape as well.
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
What about the human population problem? These children would have gone on to create more children who would create more children who would create more children, etc, etc.
Ãanisty
Well-Known Member
It's not my responsibility to have a baby to support you when you get old.
Quiddity
UndertheInfluenceofGiants
That's all nice and danddy, but unless you can show that it's related to some official doctrine in their community, it's irrelavent.
Quiddity
UndertheInfluenceofGiants
A right we have? Nature itself knows NOTHING about rights. Rights are formed and interpreted by someones world view. The same goes with our American documents. Anyone voting and pushing something into legislation is indirectly pushing for either a right or to stop something. It's really no different. Both theist and non-theist bring subjective ideas to the table and things form from there. Freedom has never been about doing whatever strikes you fancy (and I know you don't believe this either). So this should at the very least indicate it's bound to STOP some things.Ðanisty;795775 said:
Ãanisty
Well-Known Member
What does nature have to do with this?
constantine
the Great
why is it an issue for you?
constantine
the Great
and the welfare system would be in worse shape if they didnt
Worrying about the human population problem is a moot point when people walk into this country every day illegally.
Ðanisty;795967 said:
Who's responsibility will it be when you get old?
It's not an issue for me. Is it permissible to ask a question in a thread?
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
Actually, I was thinking global population. (And immigration--legal or not--is actually keeping this particular country from facing the same underpopulation problem that Japan is currently.)