wandering peacefully
Which way to the woods?
I've read enough of them to understand you don't understand it. But you keep trying to posit you do. It's clear enough to see it.No it isn't. Keep reading my posts, maybe you'll see it, eventually.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I've read enough of them to understand you don't understand it. But you keep trying to posit you do. It's clear enough to see it.No it isn't. Keep reading my posts, maybe you'll see it, eventually.
Well, when you can formulate a reasoned rebuttal, we'll chat.I've read enough of them to understand you don't understand it. But you keep trying to posit you do. It's clear enough to see it.
Sounds like a plan.Well, when you can formulate a reasoned rebuttal, we'll chat.
Below are my personal thoughts about your questions:1: So can a belief be an established fact as well as something we believe on faith?
2: If not, what level of evidence is required before a belief becomes fact?
3: FWIW I understand belief to broadly encompass what we believe to know with certainty as opposed to what we consider to be true regardless.
4: But I could be wrong!
Self Confidence is essential on the Spiritual Path
If I feel good, then it's good for me
But I don't impose my definition on Atheists
When imposing starts, things tend to get difficult
The chart is useful. Two criticisms though. As stated by another the word gnostic is strongly associated with an heretical sect of early Christianity. So even if I considered myself gnostic by the definition offered I wouldn’t identify as being gnostic. Second, many theists would consider its not possible to be 100% certain about the existence of God or gods. I’m not, but I wouldn’t consider myself agnostic.
It sounds as if you don’t like let alone love atheists. Your definition has a few technical difficulties too. I’ll leave that to others to bring you to account."A religion where blind (non-omniscient, cannot prove an absolute negative) faith is employed to worship oneself or another idol, replacing God."
Atheism could be defined as:
A person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods.
Another way of phrasing it could be one who believes there is no God or gods.
I’m good with either definition but not everyone is. Maybe I shouldn’t be either.
What is the best definition of atheism and why can it be so difficult to define?
By the way you need to look up the term "scare quotes". I did not say that your quotes were a scare tactic? Is English a second language for you? If so your error is excusable since it is an idiom.
Thank you for the hint.
Indeed english is my second language, and I did not know the term "scare quotes"
Coincidentally when I was putting the quotes, my intention matched the term "scare quotes"
But as I did not understand the term, I wrongly said "scare tactics" in another reply
So thanks for pointing this out to me, because I have been using quotes many times before, which did not match "scare quotes" definition
I will do my best, to not make mistakes with scare quotes again.
Did you not know the difference between atheist and atheism or was that just a typo?
Is there really a big difference between the two versions you wrote in your OP?
Why do you want "a much clearer grasp of some of those differences"?
Why do you think they "are so important, particularly to those who identify as atheist"?
How about...
A person who knows that all gods are the creation of Man's imaginings?
A person who knows there are no gods for the same reason he knows that there are no critters with big ears whistling while they pilot a boat.
Atheism in the contemporary concept means disrupting the Creator at all, denying his existence, and not recognizing Him, the world and what has come, according to their claim, by chance, a strange doctrine contrary to instinct, reason and common sense, and contrary to the axioms of reason and axioms of thought.
As for polytheism, it involves believing in God Almighty and acknowledging it, but it also includes believing in a partner of God in his creation, creating, or providing, benefiting, or harming, and this is a decoy of Godhead, or a partner who is given some love and exalted worship, as God Almighty acted. (This is a worship trap). for example (jesus with GOD)
Reflecting on these two deviations, we find that in each of the sin and bad, which shows us their bad condition
with respect
Nope, but thanks for playing.Atheism is rejecting god and it is a belief.
It is certainly true that almost every civilisation from early in human history until modern times has had some degree of theism. Therefore the argument that atheism is a negative response to theistic claims, has merit.It's not difficult....... atheism is 'without' theism, or without a belief in a god. Humans have created gods since the beginning of our thousands of years of evolution, and a study of anthropology explains why. Each group of humans creates a unique 'god', and instills that idea in each newborns mind from the day it is born. Only members of the group can really 'know' about their 'god'......
Could be. I could see someone taking it as a belief, but there is no commandments, no required ideology. No precepts of any kind needed. Really just a lack of any belief in a deity or God.
So there is no necessary belief for atheism. Folks who take it as a belief are doing it wrong IMO. Still, that ain't going to prevent people, even atheists from doing so.
A Christian may attend church, have beliefs and practices in regards an historical Jesus but see God and other supernatural claims as being largely symbolic.How is it that Christians are atheists too? You mean in statistics?
I suspect because Christian theology revolves around positive claims its difficult for Christians to engage constructively with negative non-theological counter claims.We can equally well label Christianity a non-belief, by simply stating it is the disbelief in the non-existence of God.
Why is it so difficult to understand the difference between belief and lack of it? Nobody has any trouble with the notion that a person who owes more money than he has is a debtor. We don't say, "he's not a debtor, he's the proud owner of negative $2,000 bucks!"
Abstinence is an (a)sexual position. Thanks for affirming my beliefs about (a)theism.Atheism a belief? Yes, but only if abstinence is a sexual position.
Ciao
- viole