Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is for this that it is considered flip side of Pauline-Christianity, please, right?
Atheism is not a world view. However, most western atheists are also secular humanists, and secular humanism is a worldview.
I will never understand any q that
As weak as the color of Someone's skin.
Your word, "flip side" indicates only two choices. There are actually a great many. I don't really see atheism as opposite to Pauline Christianity. Christianity (like most religions) is quite complex, with many different beliefs and practices. Atheism is beyond simple -- it is simply the lack of belief in any gods/God.
Like it or else, @paarsurrey , atheism never needed Abrahamic beliefs to exist nor to be valid or necessary.
Atheists do, however clearly hold to a 'world view' that is particular to their atheism. And that manifests in all three of the above categories of thought. Especially epistemology, where they elevate their NOT knowing that gods exist to the level of knowing that gods do not exist. That is a rationale that is both peculiar and specific to atheists.
I would say this is common among atheists but isn't always the case. A baby is an atheist, but really doesn't have any worldview. A person who simply doesn't care enough to seriously question as to whether God exists, is an atheist, but may have a different worldview than secular humanism. If you go to the east, you can find atheists who believe that the material world is not real, or who believe that certain abstractions (such as a source underlying the universe) are real, so we cannot say these atheists are materialists, meaning that they do not share the same worldview.
A worldview requires at least three elements: an ontology (what is real), an epistemology (how can we know what is true), and an axiology (system of ethics). Please define what each of these three are for atheists?
I am a believer not a non-believer, [Atheism (et al)] has no basis of its own, so no interest in its defining; on much insistence of an Atheist friend, and on her strong recommendations, I did read " God is not Great" of Cristopher Hitchens, though.
Wow, you are more diligent than I am.
I have never read anything by any of the New Atheists because from the videos I've seen I find them rude and patronizing and am simply not inclined to endure that sort of treatment. I appreciate that you took the time to read his book. AND I also greatly appreciate that you cared enough about the thoughts and feelings of your friend to really try to understand her better. That was incredibly loving of you.
Really excellent post.
It's only in the sense that atheists engage with many diverse social norms where religions are assumed true, both in specific and general meanings. Atheism isn't any sort of belief system, quite the contrary. There's no ideology that is taught and accepted. But there are feelings and attitudes that many atheists develop in our interactions with theists, but it's not realy a belief system.
And here is an example of misrepresenting atheists, which you have been corrected about but refuse to learn. In reality atheists defer to knowledge and how it is presented. There is no knowledge about gods that inform anyone that they exist in reality.