ThePainefulTruth
Romantic-Cynic
I don't have a religion and being gay is fine by me. What about you guys??
I don't care about anyone being gay and I wish they'd just leave me alone about it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't have a religion and being gay is fine by me. What about you guys??
Are there any gay who would not just leave you alone about it but keep harassing you?I don't care about anyone being gay and I wish they'd just leave me alone about it.
that would disappoint God because as any religious person who believes in him should know, he loves all people even if he doesn't agree with their choices.
what is a fact? how do you know they are facts bro?And some of us have facts.
WHAT? "Any religious person knows"...??? Some religions do not believe in a God, and besides Christianity has its god hating people who are gay. It's in the bible, in the teachings in sermons, etc. etc.
Except the action is an abomination punishable by death. The god of the Old Testament is clearly not a understanding parent who just "dislikes" the action and goes aww shucks about it.The Bible says that homosexual actions are bad. It doesn't say anything about homosexuals. It makes sense because homosexuals can't help how they feel. Besides, God doesn't hate those who practice homosexuality, He just dislikes the action just as any just parent would.
Various ways such as math, testing, careful observation, and experimentation that has been repeated and found to have an accurate hypothesis.what is a fact? how do you know they are facts bro?
Lots of parent's don't dislike "the action."He just dislikes the action just as any just parent would.
WHAT? "Any religious person knows"...??? Some religions do not believe in a God, and besides Christianity has its god hating people who are gay. It's in the bible, in the teachings in sermons, etc. etc.
Except the action is an abomination punishable by death. The god of the Old Testament is clearly not a understanding parent who just "dislikes" the action and goes aww shucks about it.
Various ways such as math, testing, careful observation, and experimentation that has been repeated and found to have an accurate hypothesis.
Lots of parent's don't dislike "the action."
the bible disagreesI believe that is a patent falsehood.
Various ways such as math, testing, careful observation, and experimentation that has been repeated and found to have an accurate hypothesis.
Lots of parent's don't dislike "the action."
Except the action is an abomination punishable by death. The god of the Old Testament is clearly not a understanding parent who just "dislikes" the action and goes aww shucks about it.
Religion doesn't have a good track record when it comes to revealing facts. Such as, if we are to take everything the Bible says as fact, then pi would equal 3. But pi doesn't equal 3. We also know that all the languages of the world did not simultaneously develop or come from the same place of origin. We find no evidence to suggest a global flood. And if human parthenogenesis did happen, the offspring would be female.you miss my point. im questioning the ontology of facts. saying facts are arrived at using a scientific discourse instead of a religious one or any one for that matter isn't saying anything at all to problematise the concept of "fact"
Religion doesn't have a good track record when it comes to revealing facts. Such as, if we are to take everything the Bible says as fact, then pi would equal 3. But pi doesn't equal 3. We also know that all the languages of the world did not simultaneously develop or come from the same place of origin. We find no evidence to suggest a global flood. And if human parthenogenesis did happen, the offspring would be female.
I'm not. I value facts over beliefs and don't care to insert beliefs where there are no facts.You are totally missing my point.
I was discussing the ontology of facts.I'm not. I value facts over beliefs and don't care to insert beliefs where there are no facts.
I believe alien life probably exists out there somewhere because the universe is so damn big and contains billions upon billions of stars with billions upon billions more planets. Though there existence seems plausible, there is no actual proof or evidence of their existence, so their existence is not a fact, but only something I believe.I was discussing the ontology of facts.
All you say is "I believe in facts". Facts are great. They are better than beliefs.
I cannot overstate how absurd I find it is that you can so casually differentiate them.
the bible disagrees