No they are spiritually ill. But I didn't see where he said mentally ill
Homosexuality and transsexualism are not "spiritual illnesses". That's not any better than saying they're mental illnesses.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No they are spiritually ill. But I didn't see where he said mentally ill
What the hell are you talking about? Are you saying that gay people and transsexual people are mentally ill?
Can't be anymore mentally Ill than thinking you can telepathically communicate with divine space people.
No they are spiritually ill. But I didn't see where he said mentally ill
The notion of sex being a sin oriented around disdaining from acts of sexual intercourse other than
consummate reproduction, homosex being an act of lust in itself; marriage is a completely different issue.
Personally, I could not give a damn; it's between you and the Lode or Satan.
Civil rights and mental illness is just a laugh riot; I can cut my jognsten off, get breast implants;
change my gender to a woman, and I am not mentally ill. But, if you are a traditionalist, you're a
bigot, racist and prejudiced *******.
That's the principle of the notion of the "sin", I find it unnatural to deny yours bodies chemical need; .
and it is not good for your health to any extent.
I believed in log cabin stance with all of this and the Libs in Murica' just unleashed these mentally
ill sluts on the populace of the American people; and they're greatly supporting these mentally ill.
It's apparently o.k. to presume the Lord accepts homosux; I just quit caring and think that is best for all of us.
See below.
See below.
Ok I think I see it, but his last sentence his says the Lord accepts it, and he doesn't care, thanks for the highlights. then in the third hes says its unnatural to the bodys needs
I guess the fact that his attitude is reminiscent to that of your average 12 year old playing Call of Duty on X-box live is a bit offsetting. "Hurr Hurr hurr...Homosux, haha, get it, because they suck! I'm so edgy you guys."
Ok I think I see it, but his last sentence his says the Lord accepts it, and he doesn't care, thanks for the highlights. then in the third hes says its unnatural to the bodys needs
Yes, mentally ill; They are suffering from chemical imbalances.
The principle in the sin of Lust is having sex to sate your carnal desires other than consummate reproduction; I did not say I agreed with it.
My jokes about ESP went well... I will explain all in time, my trove.
Yes, mentally ill; They are suffering from chemical imbalances.
The principle in the sin of Lust is having sex to sate your carnal desires other than consummate reproduction; I did not say I agreed with it.
My jokes about ESP went well... I will explain all in time, my trove.
Yes, mentally ill; They are suffering from chemical imbalances
There is no sin of lust in the marriage bed, according to the Word. In the New Testament .
A chemical imbalance isn't a mental illness. Homosexuality has nothing to do with mental illness or chemical imbalances. Transsexualism, which is a medical condition, does cause chemical imbalance because the person isn't functioning on the correct hormone(s) before beginning hormone therapy and that has a lot of negative effects.
Yes, mentally ill; They are suffering from chemical imbalances.
The principle in the sin of Lust is having sex to sate your carnal desires other than consummate reproduction; I did not say I agreed with it.
I'm willing to bet he's also one of those people who believes every single gay/bi guy is flamboyant, preppy, and "secretly wants to be a girl."
Yea,,,,,, like you cant have lust in the act of reproductionI don't personally care about homosexuals; the principles of homosexuality being a sin and particularly lust in dogma I understand..
I am not even Catholic, I just understand the principle of that dogma. I explained it
as homosexuality being an act of lust because it is not for reproduction; it is merely
sating desires, which is lust.
Besides, you're all just arguing about what you want more over than the principles of the dogma.