Is Bible Prophesy realible?

[d.n.irvin]

Bible Prophesy speaks about the Roman Catholic Worship system. Any body interested in investigating it?

 

[peacemkr]

i cant accept only the torah as holy scripture there man

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

i cant accept only the torah as holy scripture there man

Great. Looks like we have something in common.

 

[peacemkr]

and im pretty sure the Bible speaks about the church worship system not specifically the roman catholic worship

 

[peacemkr]

and yet you attend the synagogue...

 

[MaddLlama]

I still say that Biblical prophecy is about as good as any modern divination method, like my tarot cards. When they do predict the future, it's by accident.

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

and yet you attend the synagogue...

Let it go. We seem to be derailing d.n.irvin insinuations.

Shalom ...

 

[Booko]

Oh I find Bible prophesy accurate enough.

It's many of the human interpretations that don't seem to work so well.

 

[doppelganger]

It's exactly as reliable as you perceive it to be.

 

[peacemkr]

i'll take biblical prophecy over random tarot shuffling, thanks

and whatever jay, its your soul

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

and whatever jay, its your soul

Not from my perspective.

 

[Scott1]

Bible Prophesy speaks about the Roman Catholic Worship system. Any body interested in investigating it?

Ummmm..... how about me?

 

[d.n.irvin]

5 He will speak against the Most High and oppress his saints and try to change the set times and the laws. The saints will be handed over to him for a time, times and half a time. Daniel 7:25

**Who will speak against the Most High, and oppress the saints?
**Who will try to 'change times and laws'?
**What is 'time, time and half a time'?

Any answers?

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

**Who will speak against the Most High, and oppress the saints?
**Who will try to 'change times and laws'?
**What is 'time, time and half a time'?

Boy, that was convincng! Thanks, irv.

 

[Scott1]

Any answers?

Ummm.... let me guess.... the Whore of Babylon- The Roman Catholic Church?

Any chance you'll just give a link to your Seventh Day Adventist Church, tell me I'm going to hell, and start another thread?

Wake me when this tired blather is finished.:sleep:

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

No way. The SDA whore was suppose to die in 1843.

 

[Azakel]

i'll take biblical prophecy over random tarot shuffling, thanks

Not to go off topic, but Tarot isn't just random shuffling, of course that was comeing from some one that(there is a good chance), knows nothing about it.

And to go back on Topic, I believe that it is a reliable as Tarot(like ML was saying), or even as reliable as Nostradamus.

 

[Scott1]

No way. The SDA whore was suppose to die in 1843.

Hehe..... I guess "oops! My bad!" doesn't really cover it.
The SDA history as I understand it:

The Seventh-Day Adventist church traces its roots to American preacher William Miller (1782–1849), a Baptist who predicted the Second Coming would occur between March 21, 1843, and March 21, 1844. Because he and his followers proclaimed Christ’s imminent advent, they were known as "Adventists."

When Christ failed to appear, Miller reluctantly endorsed the position of a group of his followers known as the "seventh-month movement," who claimed Christ would return on October 22, 1844 (in the seventh month of the Jewish calendar).

When this didn’t happen either, Miller forswore predicting the date of the Second Coming, and his followers broke up into a number of competing factions. Miller would have nothing to do with the new theories his followers produced, including ones which attempted to save part of his 1844 doctrine. He rejected this and other teachings being generated by his former followers, including those of Ellen Gould White.

Miller had claimed, based on his interpretation of Daniel and Revelation, that Christ would return in 1843–44 to cleanse "the sanctuary" (Dan. 8:11–14, 9:26), which he interpreted as the earth. After the disappointments of 1844, several of his followers proposed an alternative theory. While walking in a cornfield on the morning of October 23, 1844, the day after Christ failed to return, Hiram Edson felt he received a spiritual revelation that indicated that Miller had misidentified the sanctuary. It was not the earth, but the Holy of Holies in God’s heavenly temple. Instead of coming out of the heavenly temple to cleanse the sanctuary of the earth, in 1844 Christ, for the first time, went into the heavenly Holy of Holies to cleanse it instead.
http://www.catholic.com/library/Seventh_Day_Adventism.asp

Maybe I'm wrong.... but I do think that my thread "prophesy" will come true....

 

[Blindinglight]

As Booko put it, it is one's own interpretation.
The Bible is just as reliable as Nostradamus. The wording is so vague, so unclear, that one prophicised event can be pinned down to dozens of events.
Thus, No, the Biblical prophecy is not reliable. Although, this may be the end of this current era, but not by Biblical measures. Other ancient systems, especially the Mayan prophecies, do have some actual scientific discoveries to back up there claims. The Bibles end day markers are again so vague that they describe several points throughout history.

 

[d.n.irvin]

Seventh-Day Adventist, Catholic, Muslin, Jew, Satanist, Buddhist , Hindu........
They are all names I tell you, the one and only criteria you should base your religion is the B-I-B-L-E and it alone.

I am a Seventh- Day Adventist because when I study the Bible and I look at all the religions compared against Scripture, Seventh- Day Adventist are the only ones that keep all Ten Commandments.

Someone tell me what religion was Christ?

His religion was doing the will of His Father- and that the bible clearly states included obeying the Ten Commandments

I have kept my Father's commandments John 15:10

Still squabbling about names and titles? They did in Jesus time too- Its bigger than that! Do Gods will Obey his commandments and go by the Bible and the Bible only

[FONT=arial,sans-serif]Hebrews 4:1 ¶Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.
2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.
3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
4 For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.
5 And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.
6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:
[/FONT]

"Every word of God is pure. ... Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar." Proverbs 30:5, 6.