McBell
Unbound
Fair enough with Saint Frankenstein.Both @Saint Frankenstein and @Deeje made these claims. Good job though, really!
You really need to read Deeje's post again.
She is not claiming that weed is not addictive.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Fair enough with Saint Frankenstein.Both @Saint Frankenstein and @Deeje made these claims. Good job though, really!
Fair enough with Saint Frankenstein.
You really need to read Deeje's post again.
She is not claiming that weed is not addictive.
now you are moving the goal posts.No, she's claiming it doesn't not get people high, does not have a psychoactive effect.
now you are moving the goal posts.
To think that makes it a cure all miracle drug with no chance of physiological dependency or even physiological effects is nothing but ignorance.
she's claiming it doesn't not get people high, does not have a psychoactive effect.
My apologies.Uhhhhhh....
Actually, those come from hemp, which has no recreational and medical value. And hemp does have great potential because it is such a great source of raw fiber. It also has wonderful nutritional benefits, and is a good food flavoring for a number of dishes. Mulch, canvas, clothing, carpet, oils, shoes, bags, paper, there is so much hemp can be used for the only sensible solution, for the economy and environment, is to switch over to this cheap, easy to grow, and quickly replaced source. Just think: we wouldn't even need trees for paper anymore.that its fibre makes he best clothing, rope, bricks, etc,
I have never made any such claim. I said no one I had spoken to who had used the oil said it made them "high". Who could say that legal drugs don't have a worse effect on patients?Both @Saint Frankenstein and @Deeje made these claims. Good job though, really!
I have never made any such claim. I said no one I had spoken to who had used the oil said it made them "high". Who could say that legal drugs don't have a worse effect on patients?
My suggestion was that perhaps people who are already mentally affected by their drug abuse might have problems....?
I don't recall saying it was a cure-all...all I said was that many people are gaining amazing results and that alone is reason to allow those who are suffering to at least have a trial to see if it helps with their condition. Is that unreasonable?
You seem to want to twist everything in a negative direction, as if your own personal experience has to taint everyone else's? Obviously not everyone responds in the same way....We have noted your opinion....there is sometimes a bigger picture than just one narrow view.
I've recognized the positives of marijuana over and over again in this thread. I've even explained that physiological addiction is not inherently negative, and provided an amazing example of a young boy who used to have 300 seizures a day, and now sometimes have none. How in the world is this me twisting things to be negative? It's not negative to point out facts like that marijuana can be physically addicting, or that cbd can affect the mind, or that marijuana use gets you high in many of its forms, and it's absurd you would interpret it that way. And I've even admitted to using it successfully for 3 years for numerous ailments, with the support of both family and physician. So once again, you have no idea what you're talking about, and the like and "winner" remark are very embarrassing for those members.
It actually seems as if you don't know what you are talking about. Did you realize that you come across as a sort of Jekyll and Hyde on this thread? You appear to fluctuate between agreeing and disagreeing....can you please just make up your mind...?
Medicinal Cannabis should be legal for those who are suffering to try its effectiveness for themselves on an individual basis, under a doctor's supervision if necessary......are we at least agreed on that?
As a medicinal drug. No.
Recreational take your own risks.
I have seen this for myself. People who had never had any use for recreational drugs found nearly miraculous benefit from marijuana while suffering through cancer treatment. Also AIDS patients often got huge relief.Cancer treatments generally leave one sick and tired most of the time and that combined with the after effect drugs plus the drugs to counter the side effects of those drugs seem to leave one with a pretty sorry quality of life.
If you look at places that have placed tighter restrictions on opiate pain killers, you will notice the rates of opiate addiction, and deaths, going up. Indiana has never had problems with heroine before, but after new regulations placed on the opiates made it harder to get them, in moved the criminals with their black market alternatives, and low and behold, Indiana is starting to have a real problem with heroine, and it's projected to get worse. In the larger picture, pot being increasingly legalized for medical and recreational has caused the prices per bushel to plummet, so much that many Mexican cartels are not even growing it anymore, but rather they are growing opium.because it is a drug that gets you high it should be regulated like benzos and pain killers
Oxies aren't because opium has a very high risk for abuse and dependency, pot, on the other hand, doesn't have that risk nor does it have the risks of conventional psychotropic medications.you can't get a prescription for oxy codone for depression or anxiety, but yet you can for marijuana.
@adrianhindes can I get your medical opinion on the medicinal cannabis controversy please?
How does the medical profession respond to the evidence made available online?
Are doctors dissuaded from considering the evidence?
I'm not aware of any strong evidence in any reputable peer reviewed medical journal that proposes the use of marijuana for any medical condition. I have never recommended it to any of my patients. I've never heard any of my immediate colleagues recommending it either.
There is growing evidence of a causal affect in some psychiatric disorders. One of the best measures we can take to improve our physical health is to stop smoking cigarettes. One of the best measures for 'some' people with psychological problems is to stop using cannabis.
Does it make sense that cannabis is classified as a schedule 1 drug when there is not a single recorded death from overdose? I am not talking about recreational marijuana, but medicinal cannabis oil. The results are online for all to see for themselves. Children with intractable epilepsy have had their seizures stopped by this medicine. Are doctors kept out of this loop? If you watch the videos in the OP I would appreciate your opinion of the content. I am surprised by your response to tell you the truth.