It's enabled and guided by the principles of evolution.Genetic engineering isn't Evolution theory though is it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's enabled and guided by the principles of evolution.Genetic engineering isn't Evolution theory though is it?
Nope: nuclear engineering does that.Nuclear bombs?
There's that word again "evolution", biology isn't enough to study the plants and animals? We need evolution too? What is "biological evolution", the evolution of biology, a chronological study of bio science advancements?
Unfortunately for you, its not sufficient either to test or to develop vaccines. Understanding the evolutionary relations of cell structures and proteins and viral lineages is absolutely essential to guide the production of successful vaccines and other medicines.
https://books.google.com/books?id=2rhNZccHwDoC&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false
The book is from 1995, so its not new now.
The 700 page authoritative textbook on cancer biology begins with the elucidating the principles of evolutionary genetics in its very first chapter, whose insights are used through the text to analyze cancer and approaches for cure.
https://www.amazon.com/Biology-Canc...coding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=G8CT5G7YTPEV60WJ8RWB
Evolution is to biology and medicine as grammar is to language.
It's possible. I suppose I'm trying to crack through the lie and prove evolution as a dogma attached to real science, meaningless as campaign promises. Will biology stand without Evolution theory? Can we understand a seed without understanding its origin?
Please try to learn something?You say that. It seems like more grammer and language than medicine. They still blast the cancer with radiation and hope the patient doesn't die?
I don't click links, could get a computer virus. But Cancer therapy an improved approach. Why try to fit that word in there "evolved"?Please try to learn something?
http://www.nature.com/news/cancer-therapy-an-evolved-approach-1.19746
Umm..because it uses the insights and predictions of the theory of evolution to develop more effective therapy..which would be clear if you click links.I don't click links, could get a computer virus. But Cancer therapy an improved approach. Why try to fit that word in there "evolved"?
That is beginning to change. Thanks to advances in sequencing technology and the development of massive collections of samples and clinical data, scientists are piecing together a more precise picture of how cancer evolves, revealing the roots of resistance and, in some cases, finding out how it might be overcome. With a growing arsenal of treatments, biologists are trying to capitalize on these insights.
“Cancer is continuously adapting, therefore we have to do so as well,” Bardelli says. In that spirit, last year he shifted the focus of his lab to studying the evolution of cancer. His team has modelled1how colorectal cancers respond to targeted therapies that are given in combinations, potentially revealing ways to prevent the tumour cells from becoming resistant. “We have very exciting data now on the possibility to track and treat evolution,” he says.
While I am anti-big pharma but for other reasons I feel this needs to be said.Why don't you sum it up, you haven't peaked my interest to read the article. Natural cures are what the ancient world used, so it would be a devolved approach? I have no problem believing many cures can be found in nature. Google Oregano oil, many people swear it's the most powerful medicine ever. Can't patent it though so big pharma needs to come up with something else.
Ignorant, science-averse denizens of the Basket of Deplorables. It's but one of many things that distinguished Evolution from so-called Intelligent Design.Just name one thing Evolution theory produces.
And what was their life expectancy?Natural cures are what the ancient world used, so it would be a devolved approach?
I'd credit the tractor, people live a life of ease and plenty, relatively.And what was their life expectancy?
Here in the States, historians tell us that the average life expectancy was around 35 years of age at the time of the Revolutionary War. Modern medicine, which has relied heavily on what the ToE informs us, now has us at roughly double that age.
Tractors don't cure disease.I'd credit the tractor, people live a life of ease and plenty, relatively.
I'd credit the tractor, people live a life of ease and plenty, relatively.
Tractors don't cure disease.
Nope, as in many cases the historians could tell what in general what likely killed them, and infant mortality is very high on the list.Anyone dying at 35 probably died from a broken back.
And why would infants be dying? No tractors, hard times. Not enough cotton, no blankets, means a cold baby catching pneumonia.Nope, as in many cases the historians could tell what in general what likely killed them, and infant mortality is very high on the list.
The reality is that the basic ToE has been well established and is used extensively in the biological sciences and other related fields. One does not "believe" in the ToE, as they either accept the overwhelming scientific evidence or they don't.
Darwin is the Creator? Should we kneel and bow now or dig him up first?You.
Ciao
- viole
Darwin is the Creator? Should we kneel and bow now or dig him up first?