Is existence possible without God?
Let me clarify what I mean by existence. I don't mean the existence of humans. I mean the system that we live in, AKA the universe.
Well...it would seem so...
The cosmos "exists". Human's are but an infinitesimally small "existent" point within that vast scale that encompasses of all measurable/observable time and space.
Lets say, for a second, that the Big Bang is 100% correct. How did the atom get into space and time? And how did space and time come into existence so that the atom would have somewhere to be?
They're (those science-type folks) working on that specified query. They're close. Just hang on...
Has space and time and that atom always just been???????
Current hard evidence suggests otherwise.
I'm not so sure of any of these questions. What do you think?
I think "
I don't know, but I'll try to find out" is the most honest and useful position for any thoughtful person to espouse.
Here are my thoughts (As of right this second). If the universe has always just been, then there may not be a God. However, It does not make since for this atom to be static for an infinite amount of time then just randomly explode.
OK. Why then does your own premise therefore remain unsustainable, in speaking "sensibly"? What aspect of your assumption seems or "feels" to be unlikely, or impossible?
If the universe came into existence at some point in time (if there was a beginning), then there must be a God. I mean nothing can only make nothing.
Forgive me saying so, but yours is but a fallacious "
argument from ignorance".
In effect, you (errantly) conclude that a lack of compelling "
disproofs" of any divine influence/cause therefore renders the "either/or" rationalization as inevitable (ie., "
God exists").
The question that deserves far more scrutiny, and demands far more concrete evidences, is..."
Did God Do it (Creation...of the cosmos)?".
Why is
any scientific theory that proposes a cosmos that "
randomly (your characterization)" pops into existence to be therefore deemed any
more or
less plausible than some Creator/God concept/explanation?
Science posits explanations/conclusions predicated upon available evidences; that's
it...that's
all. Maybe God "makes" gravity (happen/exist), but the
phenomena of gravity (itself)
can be measured, defined, quantified, and reliably/accurately predicted...and consistently so...with
no requisite deities either named or cited as "cause".
To modify the OP...we might also fairly inquire..."
Is existence
impossible without God"?
It would seem
just as likely and plausible...that
answer to such an inquiry is...
YES.
The
fact that the "cosmos" exists is
not in question.
Whether or not any deity
must be assigned as some "causal agent" of that existence (as some inevitably remaining outcome/conclusion)...continually remains questionable, at best...and only unsupported faith-based claim at most base (or fundamentalist) conclusions.
The burden of assignable evidences/causes of any attributable divine influences/effects (upon "Creation" of "existence") remains solely and squarly upon the shoulders of such claimants themselves.
The cosmos "exists".
The "how", demands further inquiry and substantiated theories/conclusions.
The "why", is continually espoused by those that seek to attribute a "directed" meaning and purpose upon existence itself. Good luck with that...