You just said that was "more likely" on the last page... Either you agree or disagree; which one is it?
More likely that the gospels were wrote around the acronym than around zodiac constellations, which I disagree with claims that have been presented as evidence so far; it's simple, really.
This does nothing to explain the Jesus fish symbol or the acronym that accompanies it.
"Ίησοῦς Χριστός, Θεοῦ Υἱός, Σωτήρ", (Iēsous Christos, Theou Yios, Sōtēr).
Jesus Christ, God's Son, Saviour.
Iota (i) is the first letter of Iēsous (Ἰησοῦς
, Greek for "Jesus".
Chi (ch) is the first letter of Christos (Χριστός
, Greek for "anointed".
Theta (th) is the first letter of Theou (Θεου
, Greek for "God's", the genitive case of Θεóς, Theos, Greek for "God".
Ypsilon (y) is the first letter of (h)yios (Υἱός
, Greek for "Son".
Sigma (s) is the first letter of sōtēr (Σωτήρ
, Greek for "Savior".
In addition, ΙΧΘΥΣ (or ΙΧΘΥϹ
can also make a wheel. Like Buddhism. Dun dun duuuun, conspiracy!
Or the stars could have moved since then, like you said yourself earlier, and to early Christians it would have been the beginning of the age of Pisces when Jesus was said to have been born.
"Could" being the important word. I'm just not seeing it, personally.
Or the astrological parallels were put in for the exact purpose of attracting these Hellenic pagans. If there was a part of this new religion that they had celebrated culturally for generations, it would ease their conversion and make it seem more natural to praise this new savior. I don't see how giving these Hellenic pagans something they could identify with right away would work against Christianity.
It's all baseless speculation on our parts, but personally I don't think it would've worked; I think the fact Christianity didn't have these things would have made it stand out from the crowd.