According to Christian teachings Jesus paid for sins by dying on the cross.
Since a payment has been done how can God claim to be forgiving. If somebody owes you a right and he or a third party pays you can you justifiably claim to have forgiven your debtor?
Did Jesus punish himself to forgive humans in the context of him being God? Some Christians tell me if there is no punishment there is no justice, if I am wronged would I not be doing justice by simply forgiving?
When I compare this to God and forgiveness in Islam I see that He does not need to be paid anything and He forgives those who repent with sincerety. To me this fits the defination of forgiveness.
It seems to me Christianity makes not unforgiving to justify the 'significance of the cross' while undermining God's character of forgiveness.
What is lacking in my analysis?
Thanks!
Since a payment has been done how can God claim to be forgiving. If somebody owes you a right and he or a third party pays you can you justifiably claim to have forgiven your debtor?
Did Jesus punish himself to forgive humans in the context of him being God? Some Christians tell me if there is no punishment there is no justice, if I am wronged would I not be doing justice by simply forgiving?
When I compare this to God and forgiveness in Islam I see that He does not need to be paid anything and He forgives those who repent with sincerety. To me this fits the defination of forgiveness.
It seems to me Christianity makes not unforgiving to justify the 'significance of the cross' while undermining God's character of forgiveness.
What is lacking in my analysis?
Thanks!