• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Homosexuality a illness? And how to heal?

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
sexual orientation depends on your sex, that's how. if they change sex, then they are no longer gay.

if stephenie robinson were gay as a boy, she is no longer gay as a girl. do you disagree?
In that case, Stephanie was always a girl who was attracted to boys. She was just in the wrong body until she made the transition.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
In the end, homosexaul need to be managed and controled (or to be healed maybe) becuase nowaday people see it as a new-flashy-trend that everyone want to do it. (go with the flow) as they said.
being a bad person is attractive, doing a sin that no one can do is attractive and being abnormal is attractive.
What scientific, empirical evidence are you basing this upon?
 

chevron1

Active Member
So the whacky story of 1 person is your reason for suggesting all gay people change genders? I do not want to be a man. No thank you.



that's not what i'm saying. i am saying that transgenderization is ONE therapy out there and it is being given to gay men who don't know better.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
gay men and women are not fully compatible.
I suppose in the same way that black and white men and women are not fully compatible, or Baptist and Pentecostal men and women are not fully compatible, or American and French men and women are not fully compatible, or rich and poor men and women are not fully compatible, or fat and thin men and women are not fully compatible, or conservative and liberal men and women are not fully compatible, or white collar and blue collar men and women are not fully compatible, or blond and redheaded men and women are not fully compatible.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
that's not what i'm saying. i am saying that transgenderization is ONE therapy out there and it is being given to gay men who don't know better.
Sooo... because the society is misbehaving is legitimate justification for people who are men to mutilate themselves in order to "fit in???"
 

dgirl1986

Big Queer Chesticles!
that's not what i'm saying. i am saying that transgenderization is ONE therapy out there and it is being given to gay men who don't know better.

Gender transitioning is only a valid treatment for people who identify as transgender and see a need to change their body.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
there is clinical data if you'd like to see it. the rest is not relevant.
There is no reliable "clinical data." The medical community recognizes the homosexual orientation as normal. The rest is relevant, because it illustrates how perceived "abnormalities" are vilified.
 

chevron1

Active Member
There is no reliable "clinical data." The medical community recognizes the homosexual orientation as normal. The rest is relevant, because it illustrates how perceived "abnormalities" are vilified.

that's not what i said. do you WANT to SEE the data?
 

dgirl1986

Big Queer Chesticles!
Empirical Data - Empirical evidence is information acquired by observation or experimentation. This data is recorded and analyzed by scientists and is a central process as part of the scientific method.
 

dgirl1986

Big Queer Chesticles!
so what are you saying?

I don't even know where to start....

If this was to be taken seriously...the "study" would be performed in an official setting, without results and discussion being published in a Journal and then be peer reviewed to ensure that it is legitimate, unbias and followed the scientific method properly.
 

chevron1

Active Member
If this was to be taken seriously...the "study" would be performed in an official setting, without results and discussion being published in a Journal and then be peer reviewed to ensure that it is legitimate, unbias and followed the scientific method properly.

what do you mean "unbias"?
 
Top