jonathan180iq
Well-Known Member
Which law?No... Law is my authority, I judge blindly.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which law?No... Law is my authority, I judge blindly.
Which law?
Asserting that you have no subjective reality implies that your law and your religion is the truth that would be objective reality. I can assure you that it is not.My Religion
Asserting that you have no subjective reality implies that your law and your religion is the truth that would be objective reality. I can assure you that it is not.
Hence, it's subjective.
So am I - but to hold those documents as flawless accounts, applicable to all men, is kind of short-sighted isn't it? Even the Declaration of Independence & the Constitution are limited in their application by those who wrote them. Their version of reality, regardless of how much I agree with it, is still subjective. They aren't holy documents.I am an American... nothing more, no need to bow to me.
The founding documents are my religious texts...
I was born in the first secular nation, what do you expect?
The CH murderers.
I can assure you that it is not.
Hence, it's subjective.
I would not do that, because I do not claim to have a complete hold on objective reality. I wouldn't deny to even read someone's response to me, for example, because I was insulted or whatever by the very notion that some, if not most, of my personal convictions were subjective.My reality existing in my Nation is objective, I walk through life with an objectivity to the values of my nations founding documents.
If you would like to try to convince me otherwise or convert me to your dogma/religion/creed,
You are more than welcome to try.
IDo you understand?
Where on earth did you get this misguided, prejudicial, and flat out weird idea?a "Radical" Islamist is no different from my vantage point than an Atheist, I believe a "radical" Islamist is a non-believer.
*neither value a human life as sacred and are willing to kill, on a State level or individual level.
What jurisdiction are you referring to?No... Law is my authority, I judge blindly.
You maybe right about that... time and place.The only thing I know is that I know nothing...
Where on earth did you get this misguided, prejudicial, and flat out weird idea?
Prejudice implies certain connotations in its undertones.
I base my opinion on observational behavioral scientific fact.
Would you like to take it to trial?
None the less... I do exist and I am present.You maybe right about that... time and place.
I wonder how vast it is. There have been troubling polls from Britain and there has been violence here in Canada over disagreements among muslims.I have got to assume that the vast majority of Muslims do not support violence as a reaction to a few satirical cartoons. So, let's hope they start speaking out against this sort of brutality.
Scientific fact is not determined in a courtroom, sorry.
Majority rules in a democracy Sir WinstonWhat jurisdiction are you referring to?
I am not talkign about just in this DIR 'Religious Debate' or generale religious DIRs ,I don't know, but I assume the topic rarely comes up in religious forums. Islamist violence has a religious dimension, though, which explains the presence of threads like this one.
So, you actually think that all Atheists are "ready to kill?" I am ready to "take it to trial" for sure. Excited, because I know your claims are baseless. Let's do it!!Prejudice implies certain connotations in its undertones.
I base my opinion on observational behavioral scientific fact.
Would you like to take it to trial?